Former minister of education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) was forced to resign amid misdeeds by a Taiwanese academic that were widely reported in the international media. Both the scope of the misconduct and the time span covered — almost a decade — are astonishing. Even more surprising is that the scheme was not unearthed sooner.
Taiwan’s academic circles have played an unspoken game that falls far below the honesty bar for years. To survive in this environment, one must possess a doctorate. With a higher degree in pocket, one then hunts for promotion by piling up a stack of published papers without consideration of content. It is the quantity that counts, not the quality. In one sense, fraud and academic juggling are deemed justifiable acts of survival.
These shameful deeds have their roots in Taiwan’s skewed societal value system — the idolization and glorification of higher degrees.
In the 1990s, the National Space Program Office hired dozens of people with doctorates. Twenty years later, it has no significant accomplishments to show for it.
The Industrial Technology Research Institute boasted that, as of May, it had a staff of 5,772 — of whom 1,371 hold doctorates, 3,135 have master’s degrees and 1,266 have bachelor’s degrees. However, despite its more than three decades in existence, the institute has only generated 20,477 patents and fewer than 300 spin-offs.
National Taiwan University had, as of December last year, a student body of 32,674 (16,925 undergraduates, 15,749 graduate students) and teaching staff of 1,993. About 10,000 of the graduate students were studying for master’s degrees, while the rest were working on doctorates. These numbers are impressive. Yet, the impact the numerical advantage is supposed to provide did not materialize in the most recent decade.
Such a warped proposition has spread not only in teaching campuses and industrial research circles, but also in government organizations, to the point that almost all Cabinet heads hold doctorates.
Society holds a blind belief that a large group of people with doctorates can produce miracles. The reality is that a person holding a higher degree may be an expert in a narrow, highly specialized field of study, but is certainly not an omnipotent prophet.
Taiwan is losing ground against South Korea. To a large extent, this can be traced to the misguided dogma-worshiping academic posturing that produces merely black letters on paper. The current economic and income stagnation can no longer tolerate such practices.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council in the US.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath