The legislature on Tuesday voted on President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) nominations for members of the Control Yuan during its second extraordinary session this summer.
While Chang Po-ya (張博雅) and Sun Ta-chuan’s (孫大川) nominations for the positions of president and vice president respectively were approved, along with 16 of the 27 remaining members, 11 of Ma’s nominations were rejected. Although the Control Yuan can continue to operate until the current term expires today, the outcome of the decisions will have a major impact on Ma and on the operations of the next Control Yuan.
There were early signs of this massive rejection. At the first review during the legislature’s first extraordinary session earlier this summer, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators engaged in a silent protest against the Presidential Office and the nominees by letting the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) get away with an easy blockade of the review. However, the Presidential Office ignored the protest, and Ma and the KMT did not listen to public calls for strict assessment of the nominees’ qualifications. Losing 11 of the nominees is a big setback, and Ma’s prestige as a leader has once again suffered a heavy blow.
The president has repeatedly insisted that the standard for deciding whether to approve a nominee should be based solely on whether the candidate meets the necessary conditions required for the position. Although KMT legislators at an early stage expressed concerns over some of the nominees’ qualifications, Ma insisted that the party line should take precedence over individual legislators’ wishes as well as public opinion, saying that a decision on whether to support specific nominees should not be determined by rumor or personal opinions.
During the DPP’s time in government, the list of Control Yuan candidates nominated by then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was blocked in the legislature by the KMT-led pan-blue camp for three years. In the end, the KMT claimed that Chen had lost legitimacy because of his low approval rating, and that it was best for the country that the Control Yuan cease operations. Despite that, KMT hopefuls continue their efforts to be nominated for Control Yuan positions.
Ma’s approval rating is half of what Chen’s was. Not only does he lack any legitimacy, even the nominations for Control Yuan president and the vice president were strongly questioned. As the public continues to challenge the institution’s existence, outgoing Control Yuan President Wang Chien-hsien (王建煊) has been telling the press that the list of nominees is packed with henchlings, stooges and vote captains who have been nominated as thanks for services rendered, because they fawn on Ma or because of election concerns.
Given the lack of legitimacy and the unreasonable composition of the list of nominees, it was only to be expected that Ma’s private lobbying and attempts to order KMT legislators around, demanding that they pass the whole list, would fail miserably.
The president does not consider his faults and mistakes. He bulldozes over public opinion and shifts blame to the DPP. A press release from the party continued to blame the DPP for its “vicious” blockade of the vote.
From the service trade agreement through the Sunflower movement to the current debacle over Control Yuan nominations, Ma’s prestige as a leader has taken some severe beatings. Not only has he hurt his own credibility, he has also jeopardized the future of the Control Yuan and the country.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS