On Tuesday last week, former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) commenced a hunger strike at Taipei’s Gikong Presbyterian Church to demand that the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) be terminated.
The following day, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) visited the church, where he asked a minister to give Lin a card bearing a message.
In his message, Ma gave Lin his assurances that “after experts from Taiwan and overseas have completed stringent safety checks on the plant, its completion will be put to a referendum, so the whole country can decide its future.”
Yet of what consequence is it if the Gongliao plant satisfies these experts’ stringent safety checks? What do the nuclear power facilities of Three Mile Island in the US, Chernobyl in the former USSR and Fukushima Dai-ichi in Japan have in common? All three passed rigorous safety checks conducted by experts.
Whether because of a natural disaster or human error, there was a meltdown at each of these plants and radiation was leaked into the surrounding environment. After their respective accidents, the three nuclear plants were abandoned and settlements and cities in the radiation disaster zones became ghost towns. Why did the so-called experts that inspected these facilities not see the future disasters coming, thereby failing to ensure measures were in place to prevent them?
These incidents are not restricted to nuclear power stations: The planes that flew American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 both passed strict safety testing, and hijackers were still able to turn them into manned missiles and crash them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York on Sept. 11, 2001.
The “unsinkable” Titanic went down on its maiden voyage, as did the mighty World War II battleship Bismarck, one of the largest ever built by Germany. The Japanese battleship Yamato was similarly regarded as invincible, but was ultimately unable to escape its fate at the bottom of the ocean.
Likewise, the Concorde supersonic airliner was once hailed as one of the safest passenger plane’s ever, until one of them crashed. Clearly, just like the best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry, the confidence and assurances of experts sometimes fail, whether through unforeseen mishaps or wayward human agency.
The capsizing of Italian cruise ship the Costa Concordia last year and the sinking of South Korean ferry the Sewol are more telling cases, since the vessels seemingly sank due to the negligence of their respective captains.
In both cases, the captains abandoned ship when disaster struck, taking to the lifeboats and leaving their passengers behind. It makes one wonder about human nature, and how people will often try to save their own skin when a disaster occurs, rather than carrying out their responsibilities.
The government can order as many safety checks on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant as it wants, but it is questionable that these inspections will include preventative checks against the destructive force of nature, unavoidable disasters or human error.
Should a catastrophe occur at the Gongliao plant after it has gone into operation, who will bear the blame and in what way will they shoulder the responsibility? If these questions cannot be answered satisfactorily, the only possible future for the plant is to leave it unfinished.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath