Investing in childcare and adult education, as well as giving women farmers the same access as men to fertilizer and training, could significantly increase food production and improve their lives and that of their families, according to a report that highlights the deep-rooted gender gaps in Africa’s agricultural sector.
The report, published by the advocacy group One and the World Bank on Wednesday, found that despite women comprising more than half of the continent’s farmers, political indifference and social constraints mean productivity on female-managed plots is significantly lower per hectare than those managed by men.
It argues that closing the gender gap could bolster food security and livelihoods. The UN’s Food and Agricultural Organization estimates that if women had the same access to resources worldwide, their yields could increase by up to 30 percent, which could result in up to 150 million fewer people going hungry. The latest figures from the organization show that 842 million people experience chronic hunger.
Comparing the differences between men and women farming similar-sized plots of land in similar contexts across six African countries — Ethiopia, Malawi, Niger, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda — the report shows that production rates among women are 23 percent less in Tanzania and 66 percent less in Niger. In Nigeria, dramatic differences were found between women and men living in the south and north.
The report, titled: Levelling the Field: Improving Opportunities for Women Farmers in Africa, analyzes data from national surveys of smallholder farmers conducted by the World Bank’s Africa region’s Gender Innovation Lab between 2010 and last year. The report is the first to pull this data together to look for trends across the continent, One says. More than 40 percent of the population of sub-Saharan Africa live in the six countries featured.
The authors make 10 recommendations to governments on ways to increase productivity. These include strengthening women’s land rights, providing childcare facilities, offering education to women, supporting women’s access to markets and increasing their use of quality seeds and fertilizer.
The report looks at the quantity of resources women can access compared with men and the returns they receive on these inputs. The research found that even when women had equal access to resources, it did not necessarily translate into equal production levels.
“This novel insight points to broader norms, market failures or institutional constraints that alter the effectiveness of these resources for women,” the report reads.
One of the main barriers to women’s agricultural output is their inability to mobilize extra labor, the report found. On average, women tend to live in smaller households with fewer men, perhaps owing to widowhood or because the men have left to look for work. As a result, women have fewer relatives to assist with work on the land and household chores. The findings suggest that women may also be less likely to afford hired help, or pay them as much as their male counterparts, and that they may not be able to supervise hired hands as well as men because they are not able to spend as much time in the fields due to housework or childcare responsibilities.
“Despite the fact that female farmers across all six profiled countries face these types of labor challenges, evidence on policies aiming to help women overcome these barriers is rare. For these reasons, African governments and donors must prioritize attention in this area and develop effective programs that help women farmers hire outside labor, use tools and equipment that reduce the amount of labor they require on the farm, and access community-based childcare,” the report says.
“We ignore this gender gap at our peril and ultimately at great social and economic cost,” One’s Africa director Sipho Moyo said. “It is a real injustice to Africa’s women farmers and their families that women make up nearly half of the labor force in agriculture, but, on average, produce less per hectare than men. This absurd gender gap further undermines the sector’s potential to drive inclusive economic growth, improve food security and create employment and business opportunities for millions of young Africans entering the job market every year.”
“If governments and partners invest in agriculture and, in particular, its women farmers today, they can be assured of a legacy of greater equality and boundless opportunity that will benefit Africans for generations to come and may usher the beginning of the end of aid dependence for our people,” she added.
World Bank vice president for the Africa region Makhtar Diop said: “This report presents the clearest evidence to date about the breadth and depth of the gender gap in African agriculture. It argues that by spearheading proven, effective policies that target the needs of female farmers, such as strengthening land rights, governments can help farming families tackle the low productivity traps that entrench poverty and prevent millions of farmers from leading decent lives.”
About two-thirds of Africans depend on farming for their livelihoods. In January, One launched a campaign called “Do agric, it pays” to push countries to meet their 2003 commitment to spend 10 percent of their budgets on agriculture — only eight have met or exceeded this target.
The African Union has designated this year as the year of agriculture and food security.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath