There has been yet another suicide in Greater Tainan, by a young man. This young man was gay. He was also one of us, and the news brings both pain and recrimination.
He was not known to me personally, and his full name was not reported. The young gay man who took his own life had a partner of five years, but the family of neither could ever find it in themselves to understand their relationship, or accept it. At work, he was subjected to ridicule and prejudice, making him lose all hope for life. It got to the point where he would rather end his life than continue suffer the prejudice. According to a report by Columbia University, homosexual people are five times more likely to commit suicide than straight people.
We are all human beings. We all call Taiwan home. Why is it that the straight among us enjoy the various guarantees in the law through marriage, while those of other sexual orientations — who are citizens, too — are denied the right to openly and freely express their love by traditionalists and conservatives, and especially respected members of the clergy, who would openly shame them? Gay and lesbian people are members of our community, too: They are our brothers and sisters, our children. Every one of these suicides, people who took their own lives because they were denied the understanding of society and the acceptance of their families, are freedom fighters, are champions of the struggle for human rights. Everyone in this country, in the community — and I include myself in this — are potentially culpable for their deaths.
I was once a political prisoner, so I understand this tragic situation all too well. At the time of the 228 Massacre, covert units within the state apparatus embarked on a thorough, merciless vilification of those who had opposed the authorities, so that they were disowned and feared by the wider society as well as by their own families. The actions of many courageous people who opposed the authorities back then have been covered up by their families out of fear or shame, and remain unknown even today. These are the forgotten heroes of the 228 Massacre, and now their stories will never be told.
In the nationalist enmity that followed the 228 Massacre, many Taiwanese prohibited their daughters from marrying into the families of those who came over to Taiwan from China after the war. If these couples wanted to marry, they were forced to rely on the guarantees afforded them by the law, eloping in pursuit of happiness, escaping from their families. Over time, attitudes changed and the situation gradually improved. Homosexuals, however, remain excluded from these developments. Even now, they do not even have the option of eloping to find happiness.
Last Sunday more gatherings were organized by traditionalists and churches, opposing the legalization of same-sex marriage. Is it right that these people can themselves enjoy the freedom of expression, and use this freedom to rob others of their basic human rights? How should we react to the preacher who on the one hand said that we should be inclusive as God loves us all the same, and that eating dog meat was no mortal sin, and yet on the other demeans and demonizes homosexuals? Should we relent?
It is fine for individual societies, religions and families to have their own special values and beliefs. However, the idea that all people are equal before the law has long been accepted as an unassailable universal human value, and a cornerstone of the state. Homosexuals have suffered prejudice and demonization for centuries, but the law should put an end to this prejudice in our time. The time has arrived.
Legislation for the rights of homosexuals is now sitting in the legislature, waiting to be added to the roster. There is already a consensus within Taiwan supporting same sex marriage. In a China Times opinion poll published in August 2012, 56 percent of respondents supported same-sex marriage, while 31 percent opposed it. In September of that same year, a survey conducted by the United Daily News showed similar results, with 55 percent and 37 percent respectively. In April last year a study carried out by Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology showed that 52.5 percent of respondents were in favor of same-sex marriage, compared with 30 percent against. These figures show that support for same-sex marriage was stronger than support for either former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) or incumbent President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in the years that they were elected.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Liao Cheng-ching (廖正井) convenes the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee. Fellow KMT Legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) sits on that committee too. I implore both of them to see to it that this piece of legislation finds its way onto the roster. In so doing, they could help consign this example of oppression and prejudice to history. At the very least, it will enable the issue to be openly debated. I ask them to not allow this prejudice to continue, to put an end to this tragic situation.
Shih Ming-te is chairman of the Shih Ming-te Foundation and a former Democratic Progressive Party chairman. He resigned from the DPP in November 2000.
Translated by Paul Cooper
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his