Rising chorus of dissent
In August last year, the Citizen 1985 group sang Do you hear the people sing? from the musical Les Miserables for late army corporal Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘) and that same song is now being sung by students in Taipei protesting the cross-strait service trade agreement.
Student demonstrators and other activists occupying the Legislative Yuan in Taipei chanted: “Reject the service trade pact, reopen the negotiations, defend our democracy,” while thousands of their supporters surrounded the legislature to add their voices to the protest. All these voices calling out in unison are very touching.
So what is the service trade pact and why are so many Taipei students opposed to it? President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has said that the agreement will help the nation’s economy and enable Taiwanese to make more money from China. What Ma is keeping under wraps is that the trade deal also opens a door for China to pour workers and capital into Taiwan. With those funds, Chinese enterprises and businesspeople will be able to easily buy out Taiwanese companies and eliminate any competition, while the influx of Chinese workers will take over local mom-and-pop businesses and seize job opportunities.
“In the future, Taiwanese small and medium-sized enterprises will face challenges from competition with [Chinese-invested] companies that have abundant capital and use vertically integrated business models. It will also threaten the survival of office workers, farmers, blue-collar workers and businesspeople,” an academic assessment said.
Since Ma first assumed the presidency in 2008, he has opened up the nation to Chinese people, money, trade, cargo and services. As a result, Taiwanese are meant to be turning larger profits and their standard of living improving considerably. However, in reality, since the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) was implemented, Taiwan’s economy has been getting steadily worse. Only big bosses like Hon Hai Precision Industry Co chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) or HTC Corp chairwoman Cher Wang (王雪紅) have profited from this, not ordinary individuals.
The situation is such that college graduates can look forward to a salary of only NT$22,000, which is about US$700 a month. How can they make a living and raise a family with such a low income? The service pact would make things even worse, as graduates would also have to face a flood of cheap Chinese labor. If this comes about, what kind of future is there for Taiwanese students?
What students need is a fair environment in which they can grow and prosper equally. They need to stand up and fight for their future before it is too late, before Ma misleads Taiwan onto a doomed route like Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, before the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) funnels more Chinese into the country to turn it over to China like Crimea to Russia. Taiwanese must stand up and say “no.” The hundreds of student protesters and their supporters are heroes, let us sing along with them and add our voices to theirs.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS