I am sitting at my kitchen table eating chocolate in the name of science. (Turns out I am pretty good at science). I am trying out some “sonic seasoning” whereby if I listen to a low-pitched sound, my taste awareness somehow shrinks to the back of my tongue and focuses on the chocolate’s bitter elements. When I switch to a high frequency, the floodgates to sweetness open up and my entire mouth kicks back in a warm, sugary bath. It is a curious sensation because it does not feel, to me at least, as if the chocolate tastes different.
It is more that the sounds are twisting my gray matter, changing how it perceives the taste.
The sound is what sensory science nuts call modulating taste, and the past few years have seen a boom in research in this area.
Sound is the final frontier in food presentation. Restaurants agonize over menus, crockery, furniture and lighting, yet often any old CD will be stuck on background music with nary a thought. However, now that we are starting to understand that everyone has synaesthetic tendencies when it comes to taste, sound is set to play a bigger part in our eating experience.
Ben & Jerry’s, for example, is considering a sonic range of ice-cream flavors, with QR codes on the tubs that will allow eaters to access complementary sounds via their phones.
Back in 1997, British chef Heston Blumenthal introduced his iPod-enhanced seafood dish, Sounds of the Sea, but that was a more literal, more Pavlovian association: eat fish, listen to the sea, fish tastes fresher and better.
However, a number of recent experiments have shown how abstract sounds can turn tastes up or down by remote control, as it were.
The Crossmodal Laboratory at Oxford University fed a group of volunteers some cinder toffee while playing them high and low-frequency sounds, and asked them to rate the taste on a scale running from sweet to bitter.
Just as I experienced in my kitchen, high notes enhanced sweetness and low brought out the bitter. However, a laboratory setting is far removed from real life, so Charles Spence, who runs the lab, collaborated with food artist Caroline Hobkinson to test whether the results would be replicated out in the field.
For one month, London restaurant House of Wolf served a “sonic cake pop” of chocolate-coated bittersweet toffee, which came, intriguingly, with a telephone number.
On the other end of the line was an operator instructing the diner to dial one for sweet and two for bitter, and they were played the high and low-pitched sounds accordingly.
Hobkinson said: “It makes me laugh because it works every time, and people say, ‘Oh! That’s so weird!’”
She put on a similar event at the Royal Institute in London for which, instead of playing the synthesized sound clips, the Royal Academy of Music devised some abstract live performances that would do the trick with more feeling.
“It works with coffee, too,” she added, and she foresees exciting possibilities such as sound replacing sugar in your morning espresso.
Meanwhile, another study by Spence also matched the savory taste, umami, with low pitches.
Confirming the hunches of so many ravenous airplane passengers, a study published in 2011 found that loud background noise suppresses saltiness, sweetness and overall enjoyment of food. (For flyers, this is compounded by the high altitude blocking nasal passages, and therefore access to aromas.)
Incidentally, for those among you who curse that you cannot hear yourself think, or indeed taste, in some restaurants, it is not unheard of for the background din to register 90 decibels, which is a tad louder than commercial flights.
“Have you ever noticed how many people ask for a bloody mary or tomato juice from the drinks trolley on aeroplanes? The air stewards have, and when you ask the people who order, they tell you that they rarely order such a drink at any other time,” Spence said.
Spence reckons this is because umami may be immune to noise suppression. If he proves his hypothesis, perhaps concentrating on umami-rich ingredients such as tomatoes, parmesan, mushrooms and cured meats in the sky could help obliterate plane-food hell.
Last year, a paper published in the journal Chemosensory Perception looked at matching pitches and instruments with odors (smell being the dominant sense in flavor appreciation).
The aromas of candied peel, dried plums and iris flowers were all matched with piano significantly more than woodwind, strings or brass.
Musk, on the other hand, was overwhelmingly brass. In terms of pitch, candied orange and irises were significantly higher than musk and roasted coffee.
This is just the start of a long and winding road of research, and the findings will undoubtedly be noted most by multinational companies keen to manipulate us into loving their products.
Have you knowingly experienced synaesthesia when it comes to taste? Does matching sound to taste seem a massive, unnecessary faff? Does restaurant noise often spoil your meal?
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) this week came under fire over his speech at a Rotary Club meeting in Taipei on Monday, when he said that Beijing’s military strategy toward Taiwan was “to let the first battle be the last.” If China started a cross-strait war, it would end quickly, without time for other nations to react, he said in his “Cross-Strait Relations and Taiwan Security” address, criticizing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for saying that she hoped other nations would come to Taiwan’s aid in Beijing’s first wave of attacks. A president should prevent war from happening, not talk about how
There are few areas where Beijing, Taipei, and Washington find themselves in agreement these days, but one of them is that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is growing more dangerous. Such a shared assessment quickly breaks down, though, when the question turns to identifying sources of rising tensions. Several Chinese experts and officials I have consulted with recently have argued that Beijing’s increasingly belligerent behavior in the Taiwan Strait is driven mostly by fear. According to this narrative, Beijing is worried that unless it puts a brake on Taiwan’s move away from the mainland, Taiwan could be “lost” forever. They