Let us congratulate the real winners from China’s latest economic disclosures: Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman and European Aeronautics Defense and Space.
Forget the Potemkin growth target Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) served up on Wednesday at the opening of China’s rubber-stamp parliament, the National People’s Congress.
It is always hard to take Chinese numbers seriously. Who among economists really believe Chinese leaders can simultaneously “declare war” on the pollution choking Beijing and Shanghai, reduce debt, rein in shadow banks, reverse-engineer the nation away from exports and still grow 7.5 percent this year?
No doubt China will come awfully close to meeting that number by the end of the year — even if it does not. The risks of having Warren Buffett, George Soros, executives at Wal-Mart Stores Inc and, of course, 1.3 billion Chinese citizens publicly fretting about a China crisis are too great for Beijing to allow GDP to fall to 6 percent or less.
The number coming out of Beijing that really matters is 12.2 percent. That is how much the central Chinese government is upping its defense spending this year as Li’s boss, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), works on building the strongest military Asia has ever seen, equipped with an expanding navy as China extends its reach into waters around the region. What better way to flex China’s muscles than spending an amount — about US$132 billion — greater than the annual GDP of Hungary.
The trouble is, Chinese spending will reverberate around the region, much to the delight of the above-mentioned giants of the global defense business.
It hardly matters that the US military-industrial complex has largely been barred from selling its wares to China since the Tiananmen Square crackdown in 1989. Western defense contractors will get rich selling to all those in China’s orbit — Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and others.
At last month’s Singapore airshow, regional rivalries, territorial spats and worries about keeping shipping lanes open had suppliers salivating. North Korea’s provocations have since given an additional boost to demand.
On Tuesday, a North Korean rocket missed a China Southern Airlines airplane carrying 220 passengers by all of seven minutes. Suddenly, declining US budgets, and the drawdown of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan must seem a lot less problematic for weapons makers.
The bump in spending, while higher than last year’s, is generally in line with China’s recent expansion of its defense budgets.
National People’s Congress spokeswoman Fu Ying (傅瑩) insisted that the added billions have not altered China’s path toward “peaceful development.” She went on to say China needs military might to ensure peace in Asia, as a few regional rivals are promoting the idea that China is a threat.
Dr. Strangelove would be proud of the logic.
In fact, China’s arms buying is feeding a very dangerous dynamic in Asia. Its military expansion only gives nationalist Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe more political ammunition in his fight to boost Japan’s own capabilities and perhaps even rewrite its pacifist constitution.
Abe’s new favorite buzz phrase is “collective self-defense,” which is his way of creatively interpreting a document imposed on the country after World War II. The concept would allow Japan to engage in military operations to defend its allies.
China boasts the second-biggest military budget in the world after the US. Officially, its outlays are still about five times less. Many analysts, though, believe China significantly understates its expenditure.
Last month, the US Defense Intelligence Agency estimated that the true figure last year, before this latest boost, was US$240 billion, about twice the declared budget.
If China believes that kind of spending will go unanswered in Tokyo, Manila, Seoul and Taipei, where governments have direct access to a US military-industrial complex craving new business, it is dreaming. It is all a bit too reminiscent of the movie Dr. Strangelove for me. China says it is trying to reassure the world, only to unnerve it to the benefit of arms dealers.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing