As Russia’s aggression in Ukraine’s Crimea republic grips the world’s attention, many in Taiwan are astounded by similarities this nation seems to share with Russia’s small, democratic neighbor, and are appalled at the extent of peril there may be for Taiwan amid the possibility of following in the Eastern European country’s footsteps.
Prior to Russia’s incursion into the Crimean Peninsula on Saturday, Moscow had long asserted influence over Ukraine — a country divided between pro-Russia and pro-Europe groups — in various ways. Economically, Russia controls energy supplies to keep a hold over Ukraine, which imports as much as 60 percent of its natural gas from its larger neighbor. Politically, Moscow uses Ukraine’s energy dependence to sway Ukrainian politicians and influence Ukrainian politics. Moscow also works to undermine Ukrainian independence by maneuvering those on Ukrainian territory who support Russia’s continued influence.
It is worth noting how Russia justified sending troops to the peninsula, home to a large ethnic Russian population.
“[Russian President] Vladimir Putin emphasized that, in case of the further spread of violence in the eastern regions of Ukraine and Crimea, Russia maintains the right to protect its interests and the Russian-speaking people who live there,” the Kremlin said in a statement.
These incidents and claims bear a startling resemblance to what Taiwan faces. Echoing the tug-of-war of opposing allegiances in Ukraine, Taiwan is divided between those who advocate Taiwanese independence and others who support unification with China.
Also, China, which makes no secret of its ambition to annex Taiwan, has long worked to sabotage Taiwan’s sovereignty with its “united front” tactics. The cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement has pushed Taiwan’s economic dependence on China to historic highs, not to mention the sociopolitical costs that came along with the agreement, which helped China’s strategy of inserting itself “into the island, into households and into the brains” (入島，入戶，入腦) of Taiwanese.
As the world saw pro-Russia forces in Crimea taking control of Ukrainian military facilities while Russian troops moved into the Crimean Peninsula, one dreads imagining what would happen in Taiwan if it were put into a similar situation. In view of the increased numbers of former military officials flocking to China after retirement, Taiwanese troops to an extent have grown confused about whether the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is a friend or enemy.
Retired Air Force general Hsia Ying-chou (夏瀛洲) was certainly not helping with remarks claiming that: “Both the Republic of China army and the PLA are ‘China’s army.’”
The Kremlin’s statement justifying its military intervention surely rings an eerie tone echoing that of China’s “Anti-Secession” Law, which empowers Beijing to employ “non-peaceful means and other necessary measures to protect China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity” in the event that Taiwan descends into “chaos,” among other preconditions.
Despite its independence and international recognition, Ukraine still displays such helplessness against Russia’s blatant aggression and brazen disregard of its sovereignty. One can only imagine how the predicament facing Taiwan could be even more treacherous, as this nation lacks UN membership and still struggles for international recognition.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS