Correction requested
With reference to Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US’ Jan. 20 letter and John Hsieh’s Feb. 8 response, we absolutely agree that there is no “Taiwan Constitution,” but rather a constitution of the Republic of China (ROC) that includes Taiwan as its sovereign territory.
The original letter the Press Division submitted on Jan. 17 said exactly that: “Of course, the government of the Republic of China rejects this claim. According to our constitution, Taiwan is a part of the ROC.”
The editors of the Taipei Times changed the sentence to read “According to Taiwan’s Constitution, it is a part of the ROC.”
This unfortunate alteration fundamentally changed the meaning of the sentence and thus caused confusion for the paper’s readership.
It is our sincere request that Taipei Times issue a correction that acknowledges the misunderstanding and acknowledges the fact that TECRO, a government agency under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, understands the Constitution of the Republic of China and the ROC’s sovereignty over Taiwan.
Press Division
Taipei Economic and
Cultural Representative Office in the United States
Ma will not step down
After Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) lobbed the first shot at President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Feb. 11, the question of whether Ma should quit as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman if the party fares poorly in the seven-in-one elections at the end of this year has become a hot issue.
It also became an item of discussion and debate in media such as the Taipei Times (“KMT distances itself from Ma,” Feb. 20, page 8).
Unfortunately, not a single person will believe that Ma would step down.
Even though the Taipei Times stated that it is common sense, common courtesy and a universal standard in the political arena that “In a democracy, the leader of a political party that loses an election often steps down,” Ma is a person who has no respect. He is an over-cosmeticized politician. He is not the gentle, kind, respectful, frugal and humble person his sycophants say he is. He has no credibility as a political leader.
Where are those promises of the “6-3-3” goals — 6 percent annual economic growth, per capita GDP of US$30,000 and unemployment of less than 3 percent?
He is a leader who will not take responsibility for what he has said and done.
The following examples demonstrate this: In 2005, while serving as KMT chairman, he said he would step down if the party did not win half of the cities and counties in the then-upcoming election. So far, he has said nothing about this statement, because he knows that the KMT will lose miserably in this year’s seven-in-one elections.
A few years ago, he demanded that former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) step down for his poor performance rating of 18 percent. Today, Ma’s satisfactory performance rating is 9.2 percent and he shows no sign of stepping down from office.
Ma knew what he was doing when he pushed to pass an amendment linking the presidency to the party chairmanship in the KMT bylaws during its annual convention in September last year.
Ma’s intention has been crystal clear — he is staying on as the chairman of KMT regardless of what happens, even if the KMT gets defeated in elections this year.
So what else can those city mayors and the news media do? Not much.
So, let us continue to pitch shoes at him.
Ken Huang
Murrieta, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath