The decision by the Presidential Office to file a criminal lawsuit against a man who allegedly crashed his gravel truck into the Presidential Office last month and seek compensation for the damage reveals the extent of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) indifference to public displeasure over his administration. It is an unwise move that will create more distance between the government and its people.
The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday against Chang Te-cheng (張德正), a truck driver who reportedly drove a 35-tonne truck up the front steps of the building and crashed into the gate on Jan. 25, is the first criminal lawsuit filed by the Presidential Office during Ma’s time in office. It seeks NT$3 million (US$98,972) in compensation to cover repair costs.
In defending the legal battle against a civilian, Presidential Office spokesperson Lee Chia-fei (李佳霏) said Chang should take responsibility for the damage he has caused. The Presidential Office building is a monument and it would be unfair for taxpayers to pay for the repairs.
Resolving issues via legal means is Ma’s well-known attitude as a rigid legalist who takes pride in always acting in accordance with the law. However, he has focused only on his own interests and interpreted the law selectively to suit his purposes.
During his terms as Taipei mayor, he interpreted the law to avoid an embezzlement conviction in the case against him regarding the abuse of his mayoral special allowance. As president, he has insisted on the preposterous interpretation of the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution that includes China in the territory of the ROC, while seeking closer cross-strait ties under the so-called “1992 consensus.”
The lawsuit manifests Ma’s failure to understand the public’s frustration with his administration and only raises tensions between them.
The 41-year-old truck driver said there were no political motives behind the truck crash and that his hardships in life were the main reason behind the incident. The Presidential Office’s lawsuit and the compensation request will no doubt put additional heavy economic burdens on him.
On the same day that the Presidential Office filed the lawsuit, prosecutors detained another man suspected of intending to crash his car into the Presidential Office to express his discontent over military injustice.
As part of the Presidential Office’s efforts to improve security around the building, it is considering closing Ketagalan Boulevard, which leads to the building, to avoid similar incidents.
It is in no one’s interest for the Presidential Office to wage a legal war against members of the public or block the roads leading to the building, especially when Ma’s dismal approval rating has failed to rise.
Ma’s approval rating hit a new low of 9.2 percent last year due to poor government policies and his ongoing political feud with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). In the latest public opinion poll last month, 74.7 percent of respondents said they were not satisfied with Ma’s performance, a record-high disapproval rating for Ma since he took office in May 2008.
The truck crash reflects people’s dissatisfaction with the government for failing to make their lives better. Ma and his administration need to pursue self-reflection, rather than place blame for the incident on the people and avoid responsibilities.
Insisting on resolving the truck crash incident with ruthless legal measures and failing to address public disfavor will not prevent similar incidents. Instead, it will only lead to more protests against the Ma administration and Ma will see his support rate continue to plummet in his final term.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath