The government inaugurated the National Development Council (NDC) under the Cabinet on Wednesday last week, making it a top government agency in charge of comprehensive planning, administrative coordination, resource distribution and management control.
The NDC merges the Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) and the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC), as well as parts of the Public Construction Commission, with former CEPD minister Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) serving as head of the new agency.
The agency’s establishment means the dissolution of the CEPD, which was set up in December 1977.
However, it also indicates the organizational evolution of an economic policymaking bureaucracy dating back to 1948, when the Council for US Aid (CUSA) was formed to administer the use of US funds in reconstructing the nation’s economy.
Over the past six decades, such economic bureaucracy has undergone several changes in terms of organizational structure and functions. For example, in 1963, the CUSA was reorganized into the Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development, which was replaced by the Economic Planning Council in 1973 before transforming into the CEPD in 1977.
Even though these organizations performed various functions to cope with the nation’s economic needs at the time, they nevertheless had the authority as a large Cabinet agency and played an important role in drafting economic policies and advising on economic issues referred to it by the Cabinet.
However, this economic bureaucracy lost its significance in the last 10 years, with the CEPD degraded to a mere staff organ and its functions reduced to economic planning and research as a result of changes in the external environment, internal personnel and tensions among government agencies.
Therefore, the reorganization of the CEPD into the NDC indicates the government’s recognition of the inefficiency of economic planning and its anticipation of the consolidation of real policymaking power.
The move marks the government’s desire to have a more capable economic bureaucracy able to help Taiwan regain economic vitality and enhance the public’s quality of life within the extraordinary situation it faces.
At the same time, the public would hope the establishment of NDC, which incorporates functions of three agencies, could substantially improve government efficiency, about which they have long complained.
Speaking at the inaugural ceremony on Wednesday, Kuan said the NDC’s activities are to focus on national policies on economy, society, human resources, cultural development, spatial planning and government administration. In other words, it will not just focus on economic development, but also all policies that can shape the nation’s future direction.
However, for Kuan to accomplish his job successfully, the NDC needs to integrate functions that were previously under the domain of other agencies. In addition to its role of plan formulation, the new council also must effectively coordinate, evaluate and supervise the execution of plans initiated by other agencies. In a nutshell, this is about government efficiency.
Most importantly, the NDC should avoid a closed-door policymaking process in the much more complex macroeconomic situation it faces, because that is not going to satisfy the needs of the public and the nation as a whole.
The public would appreciate Kuan’s efforts to develop Taiwan as a free economic nation and help it sign more free-trade pacts with other countries. However, the public would be grateful if this new body could understand that developing a more holistic approach to enhancing Taiwan’s social security, environmental protection and labor rights is as important as formulating economic plans.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS