Ill winds are blowing through Taiwan. The old regime has been restored and the will to reform has faltered. Core values are being eroded and morale is at a low. In the face of all this, ordinary Taiwanese have become disoriented and are at a loss as to what the future holds. A general sense of malaise has descended; people feel that all is futile and there is no way out. It is as if people are imprisoned combatants, their will to fight back dissipating as the stale air in the cell slowly thins, depriving them of oxygen.
The hard-won democracy that the public wrested from the authoritarian regime has been watered down to just one election every four years. The electoral system itself has been corrupted by money, politics and the games that are played. It is now a contest fought between the corrupt and the corrupt.
Participation in democratic elections in this country, without the financial clout of party assets or the support of local factions, is a futile exercise, a mug’s game. Elections are a foregone conclusion, the roster of our elected officials decided by the financial clout or local support the political parties can bring to bear, and these representatives will simply toe the party line and protect the interests of the factions rather than act as spokespeople for ordinary Taiwanese.
Irrespective of which party or faction is in power, the winner is always big business and the suits, the financial groups and multinational corporations. They are also the ones who are really running the country.
When judicial oversight bodies intentionally fail in their duties in order to secure the favor of those in power, they not only become puppets to those who would abuse power, they also give these people confidence to carry on with impunity. The only constant is that it is the general public who are the victims.
This is how it is that people have unwittingly been giving their children milk tainted with melamine, consuming drinks full of plasticizers and preparing food with mislabeled cooking oils.
And after all these food scares, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) chum Chiu Wen-ta (邱文達) can still keep his position as minister of health and welfare. It was only because of these concerns that people discovered that senior government officials have been using imported olive oils and did not need to worry about what was on their plates. Meanwhile, unscrupulous capitalists are out of harm’s way in the upscale, downtown Taipei apartment complex The Palace, paid for with borrowed cash.
When an incompetent leader is never called on to take responsibility for his mistakes and is allowed to keep his position — all smiles — there is clearly something terribly wrong with politics in this country.
Equally, when the majority of the economic benefit from the people’s collective toil ends up in the capitalists’ overseas bank accounts, it is evident that social justice is not working.
When the government’s main source of revenue comes from earners of average incomes while a handful of people at the top of the economic pyramid pay proportionately low taxes compared with their incomes despite having robbed society of most of its wealth, it is obvious how politics and money are conspiring to exploit ordinary people.
Despite how much people may rail against this pernicious system, they find themselves absolutely helpless, pushed around and wounded with no way of getting the justice they deserve.
The rich and powerful do as they please, and no matter how much people protest, nothing changes. This has led to a sense of disenchantment not only in politicians, but in the overall political process. And when this happens, people tend to disengage from politics and public affairs. They withdraw into their own discrete worlds, looking for alternate indulgences to interest them. Those who have not yet given up still ask themselves whether they can actually change anything, or what is to happen in the future.
The public needs to wake up. It is held hostage by politicians, and while imprisoned in this way there can be no “rule of the people.” If people do not organize, they will not be able to effect change. If they do not maintain their unity, they will just be seen as a temporary nuisance and will not be able to break out of the shackles that bind. As the problem is political in nature, the only solution is a proactive engagement in politics. This is also the only real way to put an end to the collective sense of despair pervading Taiwan.
Politics concerns everyone. Democracy means “rule of the people.”
Technocratic specialization can be instrumental in better meeting the needs of the public, but in no way should it be an excuse for the manipulation of power by the few.
Political parties should facilitate the effective operation of a democracy, but they are not, nor indeed should be, the only means through which the public can participate in public affairs.
Putting politics back in the hands of ordinary people does not mean allowing individual people to identify themselves as “blue” or “green,” it means liberating politics, taking it away from professional politicians and big business and enabling civil society to have a say in political decisionmaking.
This is the only way the structural malaise that politics in this country has sunk into can be cured, so that it is the public, and not finance and capital, that is represented.
Only when members of the public become more engaged in politics and start to care about public affairs, demanding more transparency in political decisionmaking so that they can be more active participants in the political process, will it be possible to prevent the privileged minority from robbing the people of their national resources.
Only when this happens will democratic politics return to its original purposes: Reflecting the public will and ensuring accountability so that fairness and justice can truly thrive in this country.
Huang Kuo-chang is a research professor at Academia Sinica’s Institutum Iurisprudentiae.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Ideas matter. They especially matter in world affairs. And in communist countries, it is communist ideas, not supreme leaders’ personality traits, that matter most. That is the reality in the People’s Republic of China. All Chinese communist leaders — from Mao Zedong (毛澤東) through Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), from Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) through to Xi Jinping (習近平) — have always held two key ideas to be sacred and self-evident: first, that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is infallible, and second, that the Marxist-Leninist socialist system of governance is superior to every alternative. The ideological consistency by all CCP leaders,
Even clumsy communicators occasionally say something worth hearing. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, for example. He has of late been accused of muddling his messages in support of Ukraine and much else. However, if you pay attention, he is actually trying to achieve something huge: a global — rather than “Western” — alliance of democracies against autocracies such as Russia and China. By accepting that mission, he has in effect taken the baton from US President Joe Biden, who hosted a rather underwhelming “summit for democracy” in December. That was before Russia’s unprovoked attack on Ukraine, when rallying the freedom-loving nations
In the past 30 years, globalization has given way to an international division of labor, with developing countries focusing on export manufacturing, while developed countries in Europe and the US concentrate on internationalizing service industries to drive economic growth. The competitive advantages of these countries can readily be seen in the global financial market. For example, Taiwan has attracted a lot of global interest with its technology industry. The US is the home of leading digital service companies, such as Meta Platforms (Facebook), Alphabet (Google) and Microsoft. The country holds a virtual oligopoly of the global market for consumer digital
Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) on Saturday expounded on her concept of replacing “unification” with China with “integration.” Lu does not she think the idea would be welcomed in its current form; rather, she wants to elicit discussion on a third way to break the current unification/independence impasse, especially given heightened concerns over China attacking Taiwan in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. She has apparently formulated her ideas around the number “three.” First, she envisions cross-strait relations developing in three stages: having Beijing lay to rest the idea of unification of “one China” (一個中國); next replacing this with
RSS