Mass surveillance programs used by the US and Britain to spy on people in Europe have been condemned in the “strongest possible terms” by the first parliamentary inquiry into the disclosures, which has demanded an end to the vast, systematic and indiscriminate collection of data by intelligence agencies.
The inquiry by the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee says the activities of the US National Security Agency (NSA) and its British counterpart, the Government Communications headquarters (GCHQ), appear to be illegal and that their operations have “profoundly shaken” the trust between countries that considered themselves allies.
The 51-page draft report, obtained by the Guardian, was discussed by the committee on Thursday. Claude Moraes, the rapporteur asked to assess the impact of revelations made by the whistle-blower Edward Snowden, also condemns the “chilling” way journalists working on the stories have been intimidated by state authorities.
Illustration: Yusha
Though Snowden is still in Russia, members of the European Parliament are expected to take evidence from him via video-link in the coming weeks, as the parliament continues to assess the damage from the disclosures.
Committee members voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to have Snowden testify, defying warnings from key US congressmen that giving the “felon” a public platform would wreck the European Parliament’s reputation and hamper cooperation with Washington.
While 36 committee members voted to hear Snowden, only two, both British Conservatives, voted against. It is not clear yet whether Snowden will testify. If he does, it will be via a live video-link rather than prerecorded as initially planned.
“Snowden has endangered lives. Inviting him at all is a highly irresponsible act by an inquiry that has had little interest in finding out facts and ensuring a balanced approach to this delicate issue,” said Timothy Kirkhope, a Conservative member of the European Parliament. “At least if Snowden wants to give evidence, he will now have to come out of the shadows and risk his location being discovered.”
The British Liberal Democrat member Sarah Ludford denounced the Conservative position.
“To ignore [Snowden] is absurd. The issue of whether the intelligence services are out of control merits serious examination in Europe as in the US. The Tories’ [Conservatives] ostrich-like denial is completely out of step with mainstream opinion in both continents, including Republicans in the US and [German Chancellor Angela] Merkel’s center-right party in Germany. But their line is consistent with the obdurate refusal of Conservatives at Westminster [the British parliament] to clarify and strengthen safeguards on snooping by GCHQ,” she said.
The Moraes draft describes some of the programs revealed by Snowden over the past seven months — including Prism, run by the NSA, and Tempora, which is operated by GCHQ.
The former allows the NSA to conduct mass surveillance on EU citizens through the servers of US Internet companies. The latter sucks up vast amounts of information from the cables that carry Internet traffic in and out of the UK.
Delivering 116 findings and recommendations, the report says Western intelligence agencies have been involved in spying on “an unprecedented scale and in an indiscriminate and non-suspicion-based manner.”
It is “very doubtful” that the collection of so much information is only guided by the fight against terrorism, the draft says, questioning the “legality, necessity and proportionality of the programs.”
The report also: Calls on the US authorities and EU states to prohibit blanket mass surveillance activities and bulk processing of personal data; deplores the way intelligence agencies “have declined to cooperate with the inquiry the European Parliament has been conducting on behalf of citizens”; insists mass surveillance has potentially severe effects on the freedom of the press, as well as a significant potential for abuse of information gathered against political opponents; demands that the UK, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands revise laws governing the activities of intelligence services to ensure they are in line with the European Convention on Human Rights; and calls on the US to revise its own laws to bring them into line with international law, so they “recognize the privacy and other rights of EU citizens.”
The draft, still to be voted on by the chamber, has no legal force and does not compel further action, but adds to the growing body of criticism and outrage at the perceived intelligence abuses.
Separately, the European Parliament has drafted new legislation curbing the transfer of private data to third countries outside the EU and setting stiff conditions for the information transfers. Hopes of getting the new rules into force before elections for the parliament in May are fading because of resistance from the UK and EU governments.
“This is a tough issue, even thorny,” Greek Minister of Justice Charalampos Athanasiou said. “There are different views in the member states. I can’t be sure about being successful.”
Greece took over the running of the EU for six months last week.
Moraes condemned the way the Guardian was forced to destroy the Snowden files it had in London and says the detention at Heathrow of David Miranda, the partner of the former Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, constituted “an interference with the right of freedom of expression” under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The report is also highly critical of the data exchange scheme Safe Harbor, which allow swaps of commercial information between US and European companies. The draft also questioned the Swift scheme supplying European financial transactions information to the US to try to block terrorist funding and the supply of information on transatlantic air passengers.
The European Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Viviane Reding says the Safe Harbor scheme is flawed and may need to be frozen.
She wants to make it harder for the big US Internet servers and social media providers to transfer European data to third countries. She also wants to subject the firms to EU law rather than secret US court orders.
The Moraes report says the Web companies taking part in Safe Harbor have “admitted that they do not encrypt information and communications flowing between their data centers, thereby enabling intelligence services to intercept information.”
He calls for the suspension of information sharing until companies can show they have taken the all necessary steps to protect privacy.
The report calls on the European Commission to present by this time next year an EU strategy for democratic governance of the Internet, and warns there is currently “no guarantee, either for EU public institutions or for citizens, that their IT security or privacy can be protected from intrusion by well-equipped third countries or EU intelligence agencies.”
“Recent revelations in the press by whistle-blowers and journalists, together with the expert evidence given during this inquiry, have resulted in compelling evidence of the existence of far-reaching, complex and highly technologically advanced systems designed by US and some member states’ intelligence services, to collect, store and analyze communication and metadata of all citizens around the world on an unprecedented scale and in an indiscriminate and non-suspicion-based manner,” the report says.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing