The distribution of wealth is a major economic issue for every country, and it is one that needs to take into account both fairness and social justice. Capitalist countries rely on the levying of taxes to redistribute wealth, and a good tax system can make the rich hand over some of their wealth to the government, which then redistributes it to disadvantaged groups via social welfare payments.
In Taiwan, however, the rich leverage methods such as setting up trusts and transferring assets overseas to avoid paying taxes, and this means the government’s major source of revenue is the middle class, which for a long time now has been on the verge of joining the ranks of the poor.
The government suffers from a lack of revenue and often struggles to meet overheads, which means that it is incapable of performing the function of transferring the wealth of the rich to disadvantaged groups.
Taiwan’s rich will keep getting richer while the poor will keep getting poorer, and eventually, Taiwanese society will be characterized by pessimism, criticism and distrust of the government.
Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration came into power, the three things the average person on the street has felt most strongly about are increasing real estate prices, low salaries and endless taxes. However, there are people in our society who do not have to work very hard and can still enjoy lavish lifestyles. There are others who make huge profits from speculating on real estate without having to worry about paying taxes.
Taiwan’s system is very unfair and it could be described as “one Taiwan, two worlds.”
There are three things that the Ma government must do to plug the economic black hole:
First, it needs to make taxes fairer. The current system uses tax brackets that were drawn up more than a decade ago. However, times have changed and these tax brackets should be adjusted. The government also needs to come up with ways reasonably tax the rich while also using bilateral cooperation mechanisms to make money earned overseas by Taiwanese taxable in Taiwan.
Second, it needs to tax people on the actual transaction prices for the real estate they sell. Many speculators buy and sell real estate to make a quick profit, and the money they make in a single deal can be greater than most officer workers’ annual income. Despite this, money made in this way is not subject to taxation, which is unreasonable.
Taxing people on the actual transaction prices for real estate would increase government revenue and also serve to end the inappropriate manipulation of real estate prices.
Finally, it needs to make salaries more reasonable. Over the past two decades, commodity prices have fluctuated greatly, but salaries have not been adjusted to accommodate for these changes. Raising salaries to a more reasonable level cannot be accomplished by merely increasing the minimum wage. Rather, businesses must bring salaries into line with the amount of work employees perform.
When it comes to policy guidance, the government could publicize the names of companies that pay low salaries, and require that listed companies announce the salary structures of their board members, managers and employees in their financial reports. This would let the public know whether a certain company is earning money because they are doing well at what they do or because they are merely exploiting their employees.
The government must solve the cause of the economic black hole and steer Taiwan away from the polarization of the rich and the poor.
Sophie Tsou is an associate professor in the Department of Real Estate and Built Environment at National Taipei University’s College of Public Affairs.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing