Three women enslaved in an ordinary London house for 30 years: This is shocking. However, it should not be a surprise. In the modern world, the trade in human slaves is booming — indeed, by some calculations, slaves alive today outnumber those stolen from Africa from the 16th through the 19th centuries.
In the ancient world, slavery was an unquestioned fact of everyday life, essential to the economy and society of most early civilizations. It developed after the emergence of three ideas: the concept of personal property; the realization that humans, like domesticated animals, could enhance an individual’s industry; and the principle of nations, which led to the possibility of peoples at war, and therefore prisoners of war, who were then used as slaves. In early African societies, slaves were a symbol of power, wealth and status. The slaves were prisoners of war, debtors and criminals, used for domestic purposes, rather than commercial gain.
In 1444, a few hundred men, women and children were grabbed from the African coast by the Portuguese, baptized on arrival in Portugal, and sold by public auction. By 1460, 1,000 African slaves were imported annually.
The subsequent plunder of the new world’s natural resources meant a labor force was needed for the gold and silver mines (and later plantations). Slave hunters turned to the UK, and for a while, the streets of Bristol, in southwest England, proved dangerous territory for the young and gullible after dark.
However, the slaves of Africa distinguished themselves. They were skilled craftsmen, knew how to domesticate animals and were immune to European diseases. In 1518, the Spanish government issued a contract to a Flemish merchant, authorizing him to deliver 4,000 African slaves annually to Spanish colonies. In Brazil, the Portuguese reached the same conclusions: They had to have slaves; they had to come from Africa.
The engine for the transatlantic slave trade had started. It was the largest international business of the time, with African slaves providing the labor that drove a new global financial system. It transformed the world, and our view of slaves and slavery, which became equated with Africa. Before the transatlantic trade, there was no apparent racial dynamic; as the trade developed, a racist ideology emerged to justify it.
England entered the slave trade late, but become the largest slaving nation on Earth. Everyone was involved: royalty, parliamentarians, churchmen, the celebrities of the age.
The campaign to end the slave trade was the first human rights campaign of its kind, and set the template for all such campaigns. In 1833, 180 years ago, the British parliament passed a bill making slavery illegal. Slavery was dealt a blow. However, it has recovered well.
Kevin Bales, lead researcher on the Global Slavery Index published last month, has calculated that the price of a slave (on average US$90) is at a historic low. Although slavery is illegal everywhere, Bales says 29.8 million people are trapped in slavery — in debt bondage, slave labor, sex trafficking, forced labor or domestic servitude. This compares with the estimated 12.5 million sent across the Atlantic to the Americas and the Caribbean — though, of course, the impact of transatlantic slavery over centuries cannot be downplayed.
Globalization has seen the modern slave trade grow rapidly. It is easier than ever for traffickers to move “product” around the world. Technological changes have led to an increase in global organized crime, while the end of the Cold War has weakened border controls. In 2005, it was estimated that regional conflicts and mass economic migration had caused 190 million people to move away from their country of birth. Human trafficking is easier in these conditions. And it is not hard to understand why it is popular with criminals: low start-up costs, minimal risks, high profits. Unlike drugs or arms, humans can be sold and sold again.
In 2010, the UK’s Anti-Slavery Day was introduced, and awareness of modern-day slavery is growing. However, much still needs to be done.
British Prime Minister David Cameron maintains that human trafficking is an important issue for the British government, which in August announced that a slavery bill will be unveiled in the next Queen’s speech (which outlines the government’s agenda on the first day of a new parliamentary session in the UK). British Member of Parliament Frank Field is chairing an informal inquiry ahead of the bill that has to be completed by Christmas. Finally, things seem to be moving.
However, new visa restrictions introduced by British Home Secretary Theresa May tie migrant domestic workers to their employers, making them more at risk of abuse — and less likely to report abuse that does occur, because the result will be certain deportation and probable destitution.
Campaign groups have outlined other areas that could be improved: a smarter national referral mechanism to ensure that trafficked people are able to access services; wider scope for the Gangmasters Licensing Authority, as it regulates those who supply labor or use workers to provide a host of services; support for victims; and an independent watchdog. Above all, the bill must be backed by ringfenced resources so that law enforcement agencies can do their job. Without this, the UK’s newly formed law enforcement agency targeting organized crime, the National Crime Agency, will always be a step behind.
As the three women who were freed last week begin their recovery, the rest of us must get over the shock of discovering that slaves may be living next door, and get on with the campaign to end modern slavery.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath