There is growing demand from Taiwanese politicians for the government to take full account of all of the outstanding loans owed by former allies with the view to reclaiming them.
There appears to be growing frustration in Taipei over outstanding debts owed by former diplomatic allies. The Gambia has now joined the ranks. Despite successful court battles and lawsuit victories by Taiwan against former allies, some of whom have refused to repay their loans, there is still more than US$150 million in outstanding loans that is being subsidized by Taiwanese taxpayers. How long Taiwan will be saddled with these loans that taxpayers must continue to subsidize before additional legal measures are taken — if additional legal recourse is available to government — is anybody’s guess.
While Taiwan is still recovering from a diplomatic thunderbolt that struck almost two weeks ago from the direction of Banjul, there is obvious self-assessment and diagnostics being carried out to establish what actually happened, and why neither the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, including the foreign affairs establishment, nor the embassy staff in Banjul saw it coming.
Like in any messy marriage breakup, there is always enough blame to go around with the unavoidable fingerpointing, and the 18-year Taiwan-Gambia relationship is no exception. Recriminations have started emerging from sources that do not wish to be identified revealing additional loans that the Gambia may have contracted with the Export-Import Bank of the Republic of China totaling US$20 million. What the amount was for is not yet clear, but it must have been for the procurement of goods and services originating from Taiwan.
Is it possible that all or a portion of theUS$20 million from the bank went toward the procurement of the three boats “donated” to the Gambian navy by Taiwan to replace the previous four vessels delivered in 2009? If these were outright gifts, then what was the loan spent on?
As a Gambian eloquently put it on my Facebook page: “I hope someday soon, Taiwan would come out, not in a retaliatory fashion, but in the name of accountability, to tell us some of the things they have done for/with the regime in Banjul.”
“That shouldn’t be seen as breach of any [diplomatic] confidentiality, but instead being accountable to the Gambian people who are going to bear the brunt of the loan repayment,” he said.
It should be noted that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) agreed to the deal to replace four 50-ton Dvora class (known in Taiwan as Hai Ou or Seagull) during his visit to Banjul in April last year. One of these 50-ton vessels reportedly “suffered serious damage,” suspected to have been linked to the 2005 massacre of 50 African nationals, including 44 Ghanaians.
According to diplomat.com, the group of African nationals was reportedly picked up by Gambian naval vessels in international waters, transported to the Gambia and hacked up by “security forces, axes, machetes and other weapons. A Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative report linked Jammeh to this heinous crimes.
Jammeh withdrew Gambia’s membership from the Commonwealth last month, and abruptly severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan. It could all be attributed to coincidence, and it may not all be. Time will tell.
Meanwhile, it is hoped that in due course that Taiwan’s government will shed light on these loans, particularly as reports start to emerge suggesting that some of these marine assets have found their way into Moroccan waters, where they are being operated privately — assets meant for the Gambia and the Gambian navy to ensure, in the words of the Gambian vice president in receiving these vessels, as quoted by the local newspaper, The Point: “That our territorial waters are well protected, together with our marine resources, and address banditry at seas as well as deter or punish the criminals.”
Unlike the US$10 million in cash that Jammeh demanded from the Taiwan with the specific request that a receipt was not needed — which was refused — the Export-Import Bank was receipted and the goods and services invoiced, and thus should be easily identified.
We hope the government of Taiwan will make this information public so that the matter can be pursued. The Gambian people deserve to know what is being contracted in their name by a regime that has now been shown to be both corrupt, and therefore undeserving to be shielded from public scrutiny.
Sidi Sanneh is a former foreign minister of the Gambia. The original of this article was posted on his blog on Friday last week.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath