Can Taiwan copy Palestine?
A few days ago, a historic event took place at the UN General Assembly: The first vote since Palestine was given observer status.
Unity is the most crucial factor behind Palestine’s journey from the longstanding conflict with Israel to de facto independence and now UN observer status.
Taiwan, on the other hand, has to struggle for membership of international organizations, not to mention any level of participation in the UN.
Just like Palestine, Taiwan has a chaotic background with may parties tugging and pulling in different directions, but why has the nation been unable to achieve international recognition?
The political separation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, their mutual differences and isolation mean that the two will never meet, but no one wants to extract Taiwan from the quagmire left by history. The government clings to an outdated Constitution and claims that it has sovereignty over China.
The People’s Republic of China constantly tries to intimidate Taiwan into unification. Neither party is willing to face up to facts.
The desire to bring Taiwan into the UN has always existed, and ambitious people with lofty ideals have never given up the struggle toward that goal. The problem is that the struggle has always been suppressed and never received government recognition, which promotes unification and makes conditions for UN membership unfavorable. If it can not even create domestic unity on this issue, it is not strange that the international community ignores Taiwan.
Palestine was elevated from “observer entity” to “nonmember observer state” late last year, and it has now cast its historic first vote in the General Assembly. Will Taiwan be able to follow the same path and become a dignified member of the global village?
Yang Mien-chieh
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath