Blame Jammeh for breakup
First, let me say I am a Gambian national and very much appreciated the great contribution of Taiwan toward all corners of our economic development. Unfortunately, Gambian President Yahya Jammeh, who came to power in a military coup in 1994, controls the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Therefore, he can do whatever he likes, including unceremoniously cutting off relations with our best friend in the world.
The entire country is upset and are in mourning, but no one dares to speak out because it is a dictatorship — you could easily disappear for defending our relationship with Taiwan.
In addition, Jammeh is in desperate need of cash. Due to his terrible human rights record, he is now looking out for more money via new friends. Unfortunately, most of the cash goes to his personal bank account.
A few weeks ago, Jammeh also dumped the Commonwealth for the same reason, but this time around, he blamed “colonialism,” which was itself not true. Gambians are very sorry about what happened between Taiwan and us, but we hope that a better and more truthful relationship will be established in the near future — surely not under an ungrateful regime.
Marieme Sey
Banjul, the Gambia
Lesson from Tibet
In a lecture a few days ago, Yuan Hongbing (袁紅冰), an exiled Chinese academic now living in Australia, warned his audience and the nation that Taiwan must not sign a peace treaty with China and that if Taiwan signs a peace pact, the Taiwan of tomorrow will become like the Tibet of today.
Yen’s warning did not ignite a fire or attract the media’s attention to make it to the front pages of the print media. Neither did it become a topic of discussion in TV talk shows in the electronic media.
The timing of Yen’s bringing up this issue is significant, meaningful and insightful. He must be seeing something happening that the Taiwanese public is not.
Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is for unification with China, it seems reasonable to believe that Ma and his lieutenants are right now at full speed planning, working and negotiating — underground and in private — on this issue with government officials in China.
What will a peace treaty mean for Taiwanese? It is dangerous to think and believe that a peace treaty with China will be beneficial to Taiwan and that it will bring prosperity and a better life for its people, and peace in the nation forever.
Taiwanese need to remember that China is a militarily aggressive country and an unfriendly neighbor whose ultimate goal is to take over, control and annex Taiwan.
More important is that Taiwanese need to learn a lesson from Tibet. China and Tibet signed a “17-Point Peace Agreement” in 1951. After that, the conflict between Tibetans and the Chinese never stopped. In 1956, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army moved into Tibet. The latest information available is that at least 2 million Tibetans have been killed since then.
On the issue of a peace treaty, Taiwanese need to think more, read more and see more.
There are, of course, many articles and books on this subject. At least one article available is titled “Taiwan must avoid becoming a new Tibet” by Chow Mei-li (周美里), published in the Taipei Times on April 2, 2010. It is useful, helpful and educational to understand what has been happening in Tibet.
What happened in Tibet must not happen in Taiwan. Taiwanese have to realize this before it is too late.
Ken Huang
Murrieta, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath