When the Minister of finance reported on the state of government debt a few days ago, saying that it was going off the scale, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) reaction was: “Government debt in some countries stands at 200 percent of GDP, but they are doing just fine. That is why a lot of people wonder what we are afraid of, saying ‘Go on, borrow some more.’ Why can’t we issue more debt?”
This response is deeply regrettable and a cause for great concern given the uncertain future of today’s young and future generations.
On the face of it, Taiwan’s national debt stands at 38.6 percent, a lot less than in other high-debt countries. This seems to imply that Taiwan’s debt situation is both sound and safe. However, in reality this hides a risk for potential national bankruptcy, because the government’s definition of national debt differs from the international standard.
This also means that when the government makes debt comparisons with other countries, the results are often ridiculous because of the different calculation standards.
According to articles 4 and 5 of the Public Debt Act (公共債務法), the government issues non-self-liquidating debt with a maturity of one year or more, excluding short-term debt with a maturity of less than one year.
Furthermore, in 2010, the Control Yuan issued a correction to the Cabinet because it thinks that although the formula for calculating national debt meets the legal requirements, it does not comply with the international definition and therefore it is not suitable for making comparisons with other countries.
In June, the legislature passed an amendment to the Public Debt Act that replaces GNP with GDP as the basis for debt calculation and amends the debt ceiling for the national and local governments so that debt may not exceed 40.6 percent and 9.4 percent respectively, of the average nominal GDP for the previous three fiscal years.
These changes are the main ways in which the government wants to restructure local governments, amend the debt restriction structure for the different government levels and meet international standards.
However, this is nothing but a flawed recipe for issuing more debt.
This flawed amendment, together with the repeatedly raised debt ceiling, will not be a positive recipe for handling the deteriorating debt situation. It is more like a sugar-coated poison pill that will do nothing to control the situation, but instead will increase debt by NT$72 billion (US$2.43 billion).
It has been 20 years since the government was told that it must understand the taxes paid by the public are the precondition for the government services that they need and enjoy, and that continuously borrowing money will not promote public happiness and satisfy more needs.
The transformation and upgrading of the country’s industrial structure is not going very well, unscrupulous businesses create scandal after scandal, overall economic performance over the past few years has started out promising much and ended in desperation, and the government is only capable of promoting tax incentives, as if tax cuts were a cure-all.
The result has been that Taiwan’s tax burden is among the world’s lowest.
This in turn has affected the constantly deteriorating fiscal situation, which in future will force the government to issue debt simply to be able to finance its policies and budgets. This has led to a situation in which the government needs to raise debt to service debt, just as so-called “credit card slaves” must rely on their cards to make ends meet, placing the government in a vicious circle that it is unable extract itself from.
This is why, as Taiwan is facing its current fiscal difficulties and national debt is bringing the nation to the edge of the cliff, we again call on the president to rein in his horses and stop raising the debt so that long-term sustainable development for coming generations can be promoted.
This is a situation that cannot be faced with the mindset that it is okay to borrow more money.
Wu Hui-lin is a researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research. Huang Shih-chang is an assistant researcher at the institution.
Translated by Perry Svensson
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented