The typhoon that Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) predicted finally arrived, hitting Taiwan on Sept. 19. Thankfully, it was not too destructive. However, the political storm stirred up by the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) continues to rage, lashing the country with a different kind of wind and rain.
The storm has not only put the executive and legislative branches of government at loggerheads, it has also eroded the public’s trust in the judiciary amid ongoing controversies over improper lobbying and illegal wiretapping involving President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
Since Ma came to power in 2008, he has managed to secure a tight grip on the KMT. Despite this, in his more than five years of tenure, matters in Taiwan have gone from bad to worse, to the point that the president has now become an object of derision, with approval ratings languishing below 10 percent. How did it come to this?
MA’S OVERREACH
Recently, several civil law experts issued a statement criticizing Ma for increasingly overstepping his role as defined by the Constitution, threatening the nation with a constitutional crisis and directly causing the current political turmoil.
The failings of Taiwan’s constitutional government are the result of the historical baggage with which the nation is laden. When the KMT government moved to Taiwan, it said that it would govern according to the Republic of China Constitution, which has been continually revised as situations arose, leading to a variety of problems.
In terms of the basic checks on power and accountability, the Constitution is utterly impotent in guarding against abuses of power by the president. It gives the president power, but no accountability: The nation’s presidents do not have to hold themselves accountable to the legislature.
The premier, in contrast, can be held accountable, but wields little power. Given this, when Ma says that the premier does not need to apologize to the legislature, how can Jiang then take it upon himself to apologize as a way to resolve the situation?
TAKING RESPONSIBILITY
Consequently, the only person with the power and authority to resolve the current stalemate between the executive and the legislature is Ma, in his constitutional capacity as president.
If he has no interest in taking responsibility for the political turmoil and chooses to sit in the sidelines and watch the situation unfold, the public has no alternative but to look on as well, not knowing how long they will have to endure the tense drama involving a poker-faced premier and Wang awkwardly carrying on in his role.
The person who is responsible for creating this mess should find the solution for it. Ma did apologize to the public for the shortcomings of the revised Accounting Act (會計法), so it is difficult to see how he could not see that the public would be even more incensed over this constitutional stalemate.
COMPROMISE
To set Taiwan’s democracy and constitutional government back on track, Ma ought to cease his posturing and show a little wisdom and integrity by apologizing to the public, as well as brokering a compromise between the executive and the legislature.
This is the only way he can prevent Taiwan’s hard-won democracy from coming crashing down. Is this scenario the kind of historical legacy a politician craves to leave behind?
Ku Chung-hwa is a standing board member of Citizen’s Congress Watch.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath