When Chinese police beat elderly former professor Sun Wenguang (孫文廣) so badly they broke four ribs, it was just part of the price he has paid for a lifetime defying authority.
The white-haired, soft-spoken Sun first went to prison nearly 50 years ago and is now one of China’s oldest activists, admired by the younger generation for his doggedness.
He turns 80 next month, but still persists in simple acts of protest, dodging minders in a risky game of cat and mouse.
“I am, in their view, a bastard who just won’t stop,” he said, chuckling in, his study late one night after his monitors had left. “If my rights are infringed then I have to fight back. I can’t just give up my rights.”
Sun is kept under regular surveillance by Chinese authorities, with a round-the-clock guard posted at his apartment at sensitive times.
During the trial of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) secretary for Chongqing Bo Xilai (薄熙來) in his home town of Jinan last month, a minder planted himself directly outside the door to prevent it even opening.
It was the sufferings caused by Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) disastrous 1958-1961 Great Leap Forward and 1966-1976 Cultural Revolution that turned Sun, then a university teacher of physics and economics, against the CCP.
Like many he was branded a “counter-revolutionary” and locked in makeshift campus jails.
However, he refused to admit wrongdoing and posted signs at the university entrance defending himself and others being punished.
When one was torn down he would post another, sending him to detention twice more for three years total.
“Whenever I was let out I would write,” he said. “They used to say about me afterward, whoever is down, Sun defends.”
For seven years from 1974 Sun was detained in labor camp and prison after he was convicted of being a counter-revolutionary — giving him more time to ponder the country’s problems.
“How could society be improved, the situation be changed, to avoid producing so much suffering in the future? I couldn’t stop thinking about this,” he said.
“If the nation and society have such huge problems and you only try to solve your own, it won’t work.”
When Sun was released in 1981, China had begun to open up, only to massacre the Tiananmen Square democracy protesters in 1989.
Every year Sun tries to outwit his minders to mark the June 4 Tiananmen anniversary, and the death of then-CCP general secretary Zhao Ziyang (趙紫陽) who was ousted after sympathizing with the demonstrators.
It was his attempt to honor Zhao in 2009 that provoked the vicious beating. He sneaked past guards swarming his building and made it to a park before being dragged aside and thrashed.
“Even with lots of people around that didn’t stop them,” he said.
Undeterred, Sun escaped his guards ahead of the Tiananmen anniversary this year by going out for a swim every day until they stopped bothering to follow him.
That freed him to meet friends on an agreed date and quickly unfurl a banner in public.
“Seeing this of the older generation of activists is a huge encouragement,” said Hu Jia (胡佳), a prominent Beijing-based dissident. “Professor Sun — for both his thinking and his actions — is an icon for Chinese dissidents.”
Sun has poured his political views into books criticizing CCP rule and advocating free elections.
His 2002 collected essays were scribbled in jail, some on toilet paper with a reed plucked from his straw bedding and dipped in soy sauce.
After his second book came out in Hong Kong two years later, he was banned from traveling outside China.
He has yet to see his latest work — about his attempts to run for office — after a friend had a copy confiscated while bringing it into the mainland from Hong Kong.
In 2007 and 2011 Sun tried to win a seat on the local legislature, fully aware that the rubberstamp body was not holding genuine elections.
Police tore down his posters and, the second time, banned him from campaigning at his former campus.
Instead he crept in at odd hours to make speeches to whatever students he could find.
Sun belongs to the older school of Chinese activists who directly provoke the authorities with calls for democracy, whereas the less-confrontational newer generation tries to uphold existing laws, Human Rights Watch Asia researcher Maya Wang said.
“He is respected for his long years of activism and the fact that he has persisted in the face of both harassment and physical threats as well as house arrest,” she said. “From his generation it’s very rare to have somebody who continues to do this.”
Sun believes that if more Chinese also press for change, the party will eventually have to bow to democracy — treacherous words in the tightly controlled state.
“Political reform is necessary for the [CCP]... If they don’t do it right then they may not survive,” he said. “The way forward will ultimately be decided not by the party, but by the people.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath