A recent story published by Agence France-Presse about the flip side of Germany’s economic miracle may provide some insight into Taiwan’s labor policymaking as workers in both countries face the same problem of low wages, despite fairly good GDP figures and unemployment rates.
In Europe’s biggest economy, about 3 million workers earn less than 6 euros an hour, making Germany the country with the biggest portion of low-wage workers in Europe. That figure stands in contrast to the country’s impressing 6.8 percent unemployment rate.
Unlike many other countries such as France, the US and Taiwan, Germany has not set a minimum wage, making it difficult to find a solution to the problem.
Employers in France are obliged to pay a minimum wage of 9.50 euros (NT$376) per hour, while US employers must pay US$7.25 (NT$215) per hour to allow workers to have a decent standard of living amid rising costs.
Taiwan’s situation is somewhat different from that in Germany, given the differences in their respective economic structures. However, the problem of low wages in Taiwan is even more acute than in Germany.
Taiwanese employees have staged a series of protests recently requesting higher salaries as they found their wages have not just stagnated, but are decreasing, meaning many are struggling to make ends meet.
In the first four months of the year the nation’s real average monthly income fell to a level last seen 16 years ago at NT$55,062, according to the statistics released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS).
The main purpose of a minimum wage is to ensure that workers can enjoy a basic standard of living. Currently, Taiwan’s system is failing to do this. Workers are finding that they are losing ground in their fight for a raise as the government takes sides with their employers with an eye on keeping the nation’s economy in check.
Taiwanese enterprises rely on foreign low-wage workers to make products and to provide services. Any increase in the minimum wage will mean cost increases. Any increase in cost will harm the businesses that count on selling low-profit-margin products and services to win orders.
Last month, the Council of Labor Affairs conditionally approved a 1.19 percent increase in the monthly minimum wage to NT$19,273 and a 5.5 percent rise in the hourly minimum wage to NT$115, following intensive discussions with representatives from labor unions and employers.
The council also decided to scrap the rule of holding an annual review on minimum wages. Instead, the meeting will only be held when the consumer price index (CPI) increases by 3 percent or more annually.
It is unlikely a meeting will be convened to review the minimum wage in the short term, as the nation’s CPI has been falling. The index shrank 0.79 percent annually last month, bringing inflation up slightly by 0.89 percent in the first eight months of this year, according to the DGBAS.
Relating the minimum wage to CPI may seem reasonable because of higher consumer prices. However, the index is an average figure, indicating the median changes of all major elements. People in the lower-income bracket are more vulnerable to rising prices of food and other daily necessities. What is more, the price hikes of those items usually outpace rises in average consumer prices. That is why people felt the pinch of price hikes in a wide range of basic goods such as electricity, even though the CPI fell.
The government should rethink its wage polices to effectively safeguard the basic standard of living for low-income workers and link minimum wages to the nation’s GDP. It should think more about helping companies expand out of low-margin businesses. Taiwan’s economic growth should not come at the expense of workers’ wages.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath