Are you happy? This question has been widely discussed lately. According to the Gross National Happiness index published by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, commodity prices are low and purchasing power is high in Taiwan, and Taiwanese are happier than Japanese and South Koreans.
However, according to a non-governmental version of the index published by China Credit Information Service, people in Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, Brunei and Bhutan are all happier than people in Taiwan.
The fact is it is quite difficult to objectively evaluate happiness. When a typhoon brings torrential rain, most people would be happy if their homes were not flooded, but it is a feeling that the wealthy, living in their luxurious homes, would never experience. Neither will the rich raise an eyebrow if the price of a typical breakfast increases from NT$50 to NT$60, while ordinary people can only sigh because it makes it that much more difficult to make it through the day.
For high-ranking officials, businesspeople, white-collar workers and privileged groups such as military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers, fuel, electricity and gas price hikes are not a problem. They will keep using their air conditioners, eat their expensive food and buy their brand-name bags — which is why the happiness index remains high among these groups. However, for those who are on the verge of poverty, higher utility prices will mean increases in the prices of daily commodities, making life much more difficult for them.
This is why a survey that includes people in the upper crust of society is not reliable. To get more realistic results, it has to include more people from the base of the pyramid.
For the general public, the fundamental requirements for happiness are low consumer prices and ready access to the basic necessities of life.
The cost of living in Los Angeles is high, but living there during the summer break, I found that a liter of gasoline cost only NT$30, a loaf of whole wheat bread was US$1.25, Super A eggs were US$1.50 a dozen and US-grown rice was NT$20 per 0.6kg at the 168 Market.
In other words, in the US, where the per capita income is 2.5 times higher than in Taiwan, many basic daily necessities are cheaper than here. With that in mind, one wonders how a hard-working Taiwanese could ever manage to be happy.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath