Trash troubles continue
The personal sacrifice by Daniel Gruber to clean up the nation’s beaches is thoroughly admirable (“A new way of thinking about litter,” Aug. 29, page 12) — unfortunately, it is also almost completely pointless.
This kind of selfless activism always makes for well-received “personal interest” stories, which the media love — the selfless hero in pursuit of the common good.
However, such stories can be profoundly misleading.
While I wholeheartedly share the good intentions and sincerely hope that such actions will spread public awareness and lead to better education about Taiwan’s trash problems (“Taiwan’s trash troubles,” Jan. 11, page 8), I very much fear that these good intentions may be overshadowed by unintended consequences.
Most importantly, cleaning beaches will result in endless, Sisyphus-like efforts because it does not address the underlying problem of growing environmental pollution.
There is now so much trash in the oceans, and more is added each day, that an endless supply of beach pollution is guaranteed (see Wikipedia: “Great Pacific garbage patch”).
Because of the amount of non-degradable garbage, cleaning beaches can only ever remove the tip of the trash iceberg.
Therefore, cleaning beaches is no permanent solution to an urgent environmental problem, just as killing your engine at red traffic lights is no solution to the air pollution problem.
Possibly worse, such activism, if not accompanied by education, can seriously mislead the public into thinking that the problem has been taken care of when it has not.
It also lets those responsible for the pollution off the hook, when they should really pay for it.
The only feasible solution is much better government regulation, enforcement of trash avoidance and recycling — the initiation of a truly circular materials economy using degradable and non-stoxic materials, called cradle-to-cradle (Google also for “The Story of Stuff”) — and enough public money to finance such schemes.
For example, many poor people continue to throw trash into the environment because they do not want to pay fees: I would recommend making trash collection free.
Let us hope that Gruber expends more energy on lobbying for truly sustainable change and less energy on picking up trash in the future.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath