Control Yuan out of control
There have always been questions about the need for a Control Yuan and an Examination Yuan.
The Control Yuan has been in the spotlight due to its failure to impeach Keelung Mayor Chang Tong-rong (張通榮). Not only have the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union called for the Control Yuan to be abolished, its own president, Wang Chien-shien (王建煊), has also said that perhaps the nation is better off without it.
The functions of Control Yuan are not only ill defined, they also overlap with those of other government institutions in the executive, legislative and judicial branches. What is even worse is that positions in these branches are considered by some as a way to provide political favors.
If the opposition parties are serious about taking up the cause of abolishing the Control Yuan, they need to be more consistent in their stances toward it. For example, when the Control Yuan tried to impeach National Taiwan University Hospital physician Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) last year following an incident in which five HIV-infected organs were accidentally transplanted, many in the pan-green camp attacked it for overstepping its mandate and threatened to have it shut down.
Conversely, earlier this year, when a Control Yuan member’s investigation concluded that imprisoned former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) medical care was insufficient, the report was widely cited by many in the green camp as evidence that the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration had mismanaged Chen’s healthcare. Many in the DPP praised the author of the report for his investigation.
The opposition parties are inconsistent with respect to the actions of Control Yuan. It is not possible for them to have their cake and eat it too. If the opposition parties are serious about taking up this cause, they really must be consistent in their attitudes and approaches if they are to achieve their goal.
Tiffany Hsiao
Rockville, Maryland
Economist’s claims ‘absurd’
Against the backdrop of Taiwan’s economy experiencing an international balance of payments fund outflow for the 12th consecutive quarter as investors pull their cash from local investment markets, economic quacks like Taishin Financial Holding spokesman Welch Lin (林維俊) are now encouraging cross-strait services deregulation in the banking industry (“Taishin urges service sector boost,” Aug. 21, page 13).
Lin reportedly said that the financial sector is the backbone of the modern service industry, but he failed to mention that the sector’s employees do not actually contribute anything to the real economy, in which people grow and build things.
He quoted statistics showing that financial sector services account for 70.4 percent of GDP in the UK and 58 percent in the US, then goes on to say that this sector amounts to “only” 25.8 percent of Taiwan’s economy, suggesting ample room for growth. Growth for what? More paper pushing and mouse clicking?
Given that the US and UK have been outsourcing their industrial production for decades, while their large banks simultaneously become so intertwined in revolving-door deals with regulators and governments that they are completely corrupted, Lin’s claim is absurd.
Statistics from Singapore, which is facing a looming financial crisis and has a preposterous Gini coefficient — with a ratio 55.2 percent of GDP — along with Hong Kong, home to the world’s largest property bubble outside of Ordos in Mongolia, at 49.1 percent, do not support Lin’s case very much.
However, it is a blessing that Taiwan’s overpriced property market is also experiencing “tax fears” and that corporate bond issuance has decreased markedly. It is also nice that Taiwanese analysts have finally come to the inevitable conclusion that economic growth appears “lukewarm.”
As an investor, I have no intention of taking my assets into “Formosa bonds,” which are linked to the Chinese yuan.
With today’s investments of time and treasure at their most critical for the future prosperity of mankind, people are living in a world where the blind are leading the blind. Bloomberg news in particular is repeating the deceitful memes of ever-expanding growth in a finite world, which is shameful for the Fourth Estate.
The disingenuous statement from Taishin’s spokesman belies the bank’s deep ignorance of what is currently roiling the markets and what is really happening on the ground. The bank’s board of directors is barking up the wrong tree. Shareholders could be handing their car keys to the mafia outside the Gentlemen’s Club, if you know what I mean.
Invest wisely out there. In the end, the one-eyed men will be kings.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath