If President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) motto of “integrity is my life” — which he has publicly repeated numerous times — were to be taken literally, he would currently be on life support.
This year’s Global Corruption Barometer report, conducted by Transparency International, dealt a debilitating blow to Ma and his administration, with 36 percent of Taiwanese respondents reported as paying a bribe to someone in a government agency in the past 12 months.
More than half, or 56 percent, felt that public officials, civil servants and police were corrupt. Also branded corrupt was the judiciary by 57 percent of respondents, the legislature by 75 percent, and political parties by 74 percent.
While the Ma administration had suspicions about the validity of the survey and argued that the results were different from similar polls conducted by the Taiwanese government, it is no surprise that people say the results more or less reflect their real-life experience.
In the past two years, numerous officials in the Ma administration and politicians of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), of which Ma serves as chairman, have been either indicted or accused of corruption. Among them are former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世), former Taipei City councilor Lai Su-ju (賴素如), former National Fire Agency director-general Huang Chi-min (黃季敏) and several officials at River Management Offices and the Taiwan Railways Administration across the country.
Just this past week, Control Yuan Secretary-General Chen Feng-yi (陳豐義) was charged with illegally destroying documents reportedly related to the KMT’s ill-gotten party assets, an issue that Ma pledged to deal with, but never did. In an interview with Next TV on Wednesday, Ma evaded the party assets issue each time he was pressed about it.
The president has also turned a blind eye to concerns raised by lawmakers across party lines that officials of Taiwan Power Co and CPC Corp, Taiwan, could be involved in corruption. This is why these state-owned companies must be reformed first before electricity and fuel prices are increased — one of Ma’s proud policies displaying questionable vision.
The implications behind the survey results and the incidents are alarming, but not without explanation.
First, this administration has gotten used to making promises it thinks are okay not to deliver. Sadly, it appears Taiwanese have also gotten used to the cheating, even if they find it unacceptable.
Second, misconduct and malfunction are rife in Ma’s government, with the Agency Against Corruption, established under Ma’s leadership, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division and the Control Yuan all failing to do anything about it.
Third, the power of media is so strong that Ma’s “Mr Clean” image sticks in people’s mind and the KMT has succeeded in making people believe it is the party of integrity or, at least, less corrupt than the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
However, Ma and his party need to understand that repeatedly flogging the dead horse of the DPP does not justify the KMT’s widespread and persistent corruption on both local and central government level. First they must deal with the ill-gotten assets and prove that they are an administration as clean as Ma promises.
Before those things happen, Ma should be very careful about voicing his motto “integrity is my life” when those who work under him do not seem to care for Ma’s life.
The full extent of his integrity, and that of the KMT, will no doubt only be uncovered after Ma leaves office in 2016.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS