Artistic vision can often cloud common sense. That would appear to be the case with film director Doze Niu (鈕承澤), who could face prosecution for helping Chinese cinematographer Cao Yu (曹郁) enter Taiwan’s Zuoying naval base on a location scouting trip for his next film project. Cao could also face charges if he returns to Taiwan.
Though the visit took place on June 1, reports of Cao accessing the base, apparently using the national ID card of a Taiwanese man, only made the news this week after a photograph was published of the two men aboard a naval vessel at the base.
It is not known whether Niu was so determined to have Cao along for the visit because the Chinese was to be the cinematographer for Niu’s planned film Military Paradise, which is about a group of Republic of China (ROC) soldiers stationed on Kinmen during the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1958.
Niu offered something of an apology via his Facebook page on Wednesday, writing: “I might have gone overboard in order to make a better film.” He also apologized for his “negligence” in not paying attention to the law barring Chinese from entering sensitive military establishments, according to a statement from Atom Cinema, the producer of Military Paradise.
His explanations do not count for much, given that the Ministry of National Defense said it twice warned Niu against violating regulations governing the protection of military secrets before his visit, and it also rejected a request in May that Cao be allowed to join the scouting trip. Until the photograph surfaced, Niu’s production team reportedly consistently denied bringing a Chinese national onto the base.
How much clearer did the ministry need to be for Niu and his production team to pay attention?
Perhaps they think creative license trumps national law. Or, perhaps they think national security no longer matters, given the frequency with which retired ROC generals and other former flag officers, including intelligence officers, visit China, sometimes meeting with their People’s Liberation Army (PLA) counterparts. One former officer reportedly said in 2011 that there should be no distinction between the ROC Army and the PLA because both were “China’s army.”
Plus, perhaps since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) rhapsodizes about “Zhonghua culture” (中華文化), “Zhonghua minzu” (中華民族) and the growing ties between China and Taiwan under his administration, while ignoring counterintelligence and military defense needs, an artist might think that distinctions between Chinese and Taiwanese do not count for much when it comes to accessing military bases.
Yet regardless of the current lovefest between the Presidential Office and Zhongnanhai, Taiwan remains under threat from China with Beijing’s avowed goal of “unification.” Security requirements for entry to military bases in Taiwan — just as for similar establishments around the world — exist for very good reasons, to keep unauthorized persons out, be they Taiwanese, Chinese or other nationals.
While funding for the new film came from a Chinese company, Huayi Brothers Media, no one is accusing Niu and Cao of being spies, just of being stupid. Given that the navy on Thursday withdrew its offer of bases and sailors for the production, the future of Military Paradise may be in doubt. For many, that might seem punishment enough for Niu.
However, if Kaohsiung prosecutors decide to charge Niu and Cao for violating the Vital Area Regulations (要塞堡壘地帶法), they could face up to five years in prison. Cao might also be charged under the National Security Act (國家安全法) for photographing naval facilities.
While artistic freedom should be upheld, thoughtless stupidity or cupidity cannot be and should not be ignored. Jail terms would be overkill, but both men deserve to be roundly condemned — and fined — for their actions. National security must remain a priority, regardless of warming cross-strait ties.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS