The Legislative Yuan began its extra session yesterday in what has now become a ritual: For the past few years, no legislative session has ended without the need for an additional session.
In addition, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said that as there were too many outstanding proposals, it has planned not one, but two extra sessions.
While legislative inefficiency occurs in many countries, the “extra session” phenomenon — unquestionably one of the trademarks of Taiwan’s legislature, along with occasional brawls — is a serious concern.
It brings to mind an issue that angers many employers: employees working overtime for no other reason than to receive overtime pay.
According to an estimate made by The Journalist magazine last year, one extra day of sessions costs NT$10.25 million (US$342,300). In other words, the extra two-week session is expected to cost taxpayers NT$143.5 million.
However, it is much more than an issue of money.
Lawmakers are called lawmakers for a reason — they make laws, which is the mandate bestowed upon them by millions of voters across the country.
Unfortunately, legislators have not been doing their job. Too often during sessions, lawmakers spend the time humiliating officials or asking irrelevant questions, knowing that the media — TV crews in particular — eagerly await their soundbites. They provide the “showmanship” that the media want, but that is a topic for another day.
Yet, those who do attend legislative committee meetings are still more commendable than those who do not even show up and believe that making connections in their constituencies is more important for winning elections than legislating.
If the Democratic Progressive Party has to worry about its lawmakers not attending committee meetings, the KMT has even more to worry about.
A lack of effort, along with political differences between parties, is why little was achieved in the regular session and most legislation that was passed has done so as part of package deals after cross-party negotiation.
Over the years, not even changes in the constituency map, the legislature’s structure nor internal regulations have changed this phenomenon.
The recent controversy over an amendment to the Accounting Act (會計法) has highlighted the absurdity and incompetence of lawmakers at an unprecedented level, with closed-door deals and a bizarre omission in the proposal’s text that was supposed to have exempted hundreds of university professors from charges of misusing receipts to claim government reimbursements.
Outraged at the secrecy, the blatant politicking and the sheer stupidity of the omission, the public finally made its voice heard, forcing an Executive Yuan veto and apologies from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and all political parties.
In some cases, lawmakers do not make enough laws, as was the case in the recent industrial starch food scandal. Government agencies either found that there was no law regulating the matter, or else they had no idea which agency was actually in charge of the function.
If what has happened serves as any warning to legislators, the message is surely loud and clear: Lawmakers should be doing their jobs and not needing two extra sessions in which to do them.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS