Countless bombs are ticking across Taiwan, particularly in Taipei. Those explosives have nothing to do with terrorist activity. However, they present a much greater danger than explosive devices. They are propane tanks.
Frightening scenes come into view along major thoroughfares and alleyways in Taipei. For instance, in business sections adjacent to Daan Forest Park, food peddlers prepare food for immediate consumption in flimsy carts loaded with propane tanks, often improperly and insecurely, which is used as heating fuel.
A gas tank retail store takes up the ground floor of a multistory building with residential units above it on Xinyi Road, a major avenue in the city. Worse, motorcycles with up to five gas tanks piled on back seats which are not built to transport them rush through crowded streets at high speeds, with no safety concern.
Propane tanks store highly flammable propane gas in liquid form, requiring sturdy mechanical containers that must maintain extreme pressure. If such a tank is mishandled or involved in an accident, it is like a TNT bomb.
Statistics show that a 9kg tank of liquid propane exploding can cause substantial damage, destroying a family house or even a whole block of half a dozen buildings. In many cases, the fire following such an explosion incurs even more damage and human casualties than the explosion itself.
In Taipei, another matter makes fires even worse. A cursory walk around several sections of the city reveals a puzzling scene: Dozens of motorcycles are parked on the sidewalk, blocking fire engines.
Ticking bombs in the city’s heart with fire engines entangled in a pool of motorcycles invite disaster. An aging nuclear power plant only 25km away already presents a risk to Taipei, a population of millions. The city simply cannot afford more threats from within.
For the safety of residents, propane tank retailers and distributors must be relocated to city outskirts, away from heavily populated areas. Regulations must also be imposed and enforced to make fire houses ready for rapid response.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council in the US.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath