According to statistics released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics on May 22, the average monthly salary in the first quarter of the year was NT$54,897 and the “real” average monthly earning was NT$53,689, a return to the level of 1997. If we exclude all non-regular earnings, such as bonuses, the figures are likely to decline even further.
In mid-April, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said that Taiwan’s economy has stagnated. He said that the main reasons for the weak economy were low private consumption and weak exports. In particular, the government had been concerned with the low private consumption, which caused economic growth to decline in the first quarter of the year.
The economic system consists of households, businesses and the government, and its performance depends on the interaction between these three parties. It is only when businesses are willing to share their profits with households that private consumption will increase, at the same time increasing government tax revenues.
As the government uses its tax revenue to improve the industrial environment, it will create an external effect that adds value to businesses. It is only through this kind of positive relationship that Taiwan will be able to boost its economy.
It is a pity that this kind of positive cycle does not exist in Taiwan at the moment. Judging from the stagnation of salaries in recent years, the growth of real regular wages has not matched that of real GDP.
Looking at the figures for 1991 for example, the growth of real regular wages in the industrial and service sectors was about 7 percent, which was about the same as real GDP, which also increased by about 7 percent over the same period.
However, in 1994, real regular salary growth in the industrial and service sectors was below 2 percent, while real GDP grew by more than 6 percent. In other words, businesses have failed to share the fruits of economic development with their employees in recent years. Perhaps this is why the public has a stronger sense of economic stagnation than entrepreneurs.
During an interview with the Nihon Keizai Shimbun early last month, Harvard Business School dean Nitin Nohria said that when businesses become greedy, society will be unable to benefit from them. People will then demand that the government put pressure on businesses, with the result that the government might implement certain restrictions on businesses.
This is a destructive relationship in which the three parties — households, businesses and government — attack one another. Once such an atmosphere develops, the economy is likely to enter a vicious cycle.
Judging from the current atmosphere in Taiwan, it seems that we are moving toward this dead end.
Fortunately, some businesses have started to pay attention to the problems facing salaried employees recently, calling on enterprises to give our young people more opportunities.
If their call can bring interaction among households, businesses and government to a positive cycle, there would be light at the end of the tunnel for Taiwan’s economy.
If that does not happen, any new policies will be affected by the current destructive relationship and the result will be that we will have to work twice as hard for half the benefit.
Chen Chien-yin is a researcher at the Industrial Technology Research Institute’s Center of Knowledge-based Economy and Competitiveness.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath