According to newspaper reports, government officials recently held a meeting in which they decided to offer the former site of the Republic of China Air Force’s General Headquarters, which lies on the north side of Renai Road in Taipei, to commercial use.
They are billing this development project as a case for world-class planning and want it to be initiated as soon as possible. All that remains to be done is to decide which developer will take control of the project.
Word has it that construction companies and other associated businesses are rubbing their hands eagerly at the prospect.
In their view, this is a good policy by the government and a great business opportunity for themselves.
However, is it a wise decision from the point of view of the overall public interest?
Unless Taipei undergoes a complete transformation and quickly becomes a world-class financial center comparable to London, Tokyo, Hong Kong and Shanghai, where is the demand for the large amount of commercial floor space that will be created by the project supposed to come from?
Construction companies are always brimming with confidence that supply can create demand, but while that may be true of a particular piece of land, it cannot be applied to the whole real-estate market.
One has to realize that the supply of commercial floor space in Taipei currently exceeds demand.
A case in point is Taipei 101, which was not fully rented out until nearly 10 years after its completion.
Lots of commercial buildings are being built right now in and around Nangang District (南港), and the Taipei Twin Towers are scheduled to rise soon close to the Taipei Railway Station.
In addition, the public has been told that the Guanghua Community near the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall will be turned into a Taiwanese version of Tokyo’s Roppongi District after it is demolished.
That is not to say that a commercial zone built on the site of the old air force headquarters would be a sure failure.
Given its location and topographical integrity, it has some competitive strengths.
However, whatever success it may have will come at the expense of its neighbors because the demand that would be focused on this area will have originated somewhere else, and because any value that accrues on the site will lead to falling rent prices in other places.
A good example of such effects is the once-flourishing Living Mall in Songshan District (松山), which is now in decline.
A commercial zone at the air force’s former headquarters will compete with the other aforementioned zones and with the entire business area in Xinyi District (信義).
If the area in question had been private land, perhaps people would be happy to see it be repurposed for commercial use and competing with existing shopping malls, but it is necessary to bear in mind that the royalty fees that the government would collect from bidding for the project would come at the expense of property tax revenue from commercial buildings in other places.
Furthermore, given that the old air force headquarters sits on publicly owned land, its development should be planned with the interest of society as a whole in mind.
It should be used for what the nation is lacking the most: residential housing for rent and lease. It could also be made into a park. Its internal finances and external social effects can all be clearly worked out.
At the very least, a comparison could be made between dedicating the land to other uses such as these and the genuinely attainable benefits of commercial use.
In the past, the Council for Economic Planning and Development stipulated that a financial analysis be carried out for any engineering project costing more than NT$1 billion (US$33.2 billion), as well an economic analysis — in other words, a cost-benefit analysis.
Although the current plans for the former air force headquarters do not involve any government spending, it is a huge project that will cost hundreds of billions of dollars.
It is therefore odd that no social cost-benefit analysis has been carried out to assess the project, instead all it took was a meeting of representatives of various departments — seemingly under the spell of the Roppongi effect — to come to an instant decision on the matter.
The role played by the Taipei City Government has also been strange.
Even amid the intense competition between cities around the world, the government of Taiwan’s capital has so far failed to come up with long-term development goals or a strategic plan for land use.
Should government offices be dispersed more widely? Should land devoted to commercial use be more concentrated? How can we provide housing for medium and low-income households?
All these questions are relevant to the optimum usage of the land at the former air force headquarters. Does Taipei have no view about what is done with its own territory? Is it incapable of doing anything other than implementing decisions made hurriedly by central government officials?
Whether the air force site is put to the best possible use is quite an important issue, but an even bigger issue for the nation is the sloppy and rash way in which the central and local governments make their decisions.
Hua Chang-i is a former professor at National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of Building and Planning.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
In 1955, US general Benjamin Davis Jr, then-commander of the US’ 13th Air Force, drew a maritime demarcation line in the middle of the Taiwan Strait, known as the median line. Under pressure from the US, Taiwan and China entered into a tacit agreement not to cross the line. On July 9, 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) described cross-strait relations as a “special state-to-state” relationship. In response, Beijing dispatched People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft into the Taiwan Strait, crossing the median line for the first time since 1955. The PLA has begun to regularly traverse the line. On Sept. 18 and 19, it
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if