China got its new president this week, completing a formal handover of power from former president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) that began long before November last year, when Xi Jinping (習近平) was anointed general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and chairman of the Central Military Commission.
The were no surprises in Thursday’s vote for Xi as president by the National People’s Congress, although one member did cast a ballot against him and three abstained.
Also no surprise is that another health scandal surfaced in China this week. Thousands of pig carcasses have been floating down the Huangpu River, which supplies drinking water to Shanghai.
Municipal officials said the corpses posed no threat to public health, while agricultural officials said there was no epidemic affecting the animals, only inclement weather. As with previous scandals, the official announcements are difficult to believe.
However, a river of porcine putrefaction is a good metaphor for the widespread corruption and environmental degradation that are the hallmarks of modern China and among the main challenges facing Xi.
To quote Marcellus in Shakespeare’s Hamlet: “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”
It is a rot that extends from the top levels of government in Beijing to villages nationwide and deep into the land, the water and even the air.
Corruption and environmental abuse are so entrenched in the CCP, the state bureaucracy and the economy that they would appear almost impossible to eradicate, despite the increasing unwillingness of the average Chinese to tolerate them in the name of development and stability.
The question on everyone’s minds since November is just how reformist Xi and his team will be. No one can say, not even Xi himself.
His selection of Li Yuanchao (李源潮) as vice president over Liu Yuanshan (劉雲山), a member of the powerful Politburo Standing Committee and the CCP’s former propaganda chief, has been hailed as a sign of his ability to stand up to former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民), who made crony capitalism a byword of his government and whose influence remained strong during Hu’s reign.
While the selection of Li, a protege of Hu’s who had been head of the CCP’s Organization Department, could have been a tilt toward reformists, it may have simply been a balancing act, given that Xi must contend with the many supporters of Jiang and Hu who fill the ranks of the party’s senior cadres and have their own agendas. It will be a couple of years before Xi can put his own stamp on the party.
In any case, the CCP’s reform wing is reformist only in its efforts to drag the party administratively and technologically into the 21st century to enable it to survive as the dominant power in China. There may be talk of making the party less corrupt and more responsive to the needs of the people, but princelings such as Xi — and their families — have grown influential and rich precisely because of incestuous layers of corruption and abuse in the party and bureaucracy.
Crony capitalism’s tentacles run deep and wide and there are many vested interests with their own agendas, including the military, that Xi will have to contend with.
His pronouncements, public appearances and populist moves since becoming CCP general secretary have hyped expectations of change, but there are limits to his powers.
Xi may be able to reduce bureaucratic pomp and circumstance, but think of all the crackdowns on official corruption that Hu launched. They barely dented the problem; efforts to combat environmental damage and public health scandals also just scraped the surface of the problems.
Whatever changes Xi is able to make, in the end a more open, less corrupt authoritarian regime will still be an authoritarian regime.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath