It is a bitter quarrel that seems fated never to be resolved.
At issue is whether Japan has confronted its aggressive and oppressive past, and apologized for the death and devastation that the Japanese military visited upon its neighbors, particularly China and Korea, from 1895 to 1945.
Many Americans, Koreans, and Chinese contend that Japan has not been sufficiently repentant for its offenses. To a lesser extent, Southeast Asians, Australians and former European colonists agree.
Fifteen days ago, Jennifer Lind, a professor of government at Dartmouth College, wrote in the Washington Post that Japanese “denials and equivocations about the past undermine the political and military support that Japan will need to manage the troubles ahead.”
The North Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), which speaks for Pyongyang, asserted last week that “Japanese imperialists” had imposed decades of the “harshest and most barbarous” rule on Korea from 1906 to 1945. KCNA demanded that “Japanese reactionaries should make an apology and reparation for the monstrous crimes.”
In South Korea, the English-language Korea Herald declared: “Public sentiment against Japan has worsened in recent years due to Japan’s repeated claim to sovereignty over Korea’s easternmost islets … its distortion of historical facts, and failure to apologize to Korean women forced into sexual slavery during World War II.”
Xinhua news agency suggested that keeping a spotlight on Japan was intended to generate support for the nation’s military forces. Xinhua quoted a university student at an exhibit depicting the Japanese invasion of 1937: “We must make our country strong to avoid a repeat of the past.”
Yet the record shows that Japanese leaders have rendered more than 50 apologies of all sorts, beginning with that by then-Japanese emperor Hirohito when he called on General Douglas MacArthur, the commander of the Allied Occupation, a month after Japan’s surrender to end World War II in 1945.
“I come before you to offer myself to the judgement of the powers you represent,” the emperor said, “as one to bear sole responsibility for every political and military decision made and action taken by my people in the conduct of the war.”
Similarly, former Japanese prime minister Shigeru Yoshida, in accepting the San Francisco Peace Treaty in 1951, referred to the war and said: “It is with feelings of sorrow that we recall the part played in that catastrophic human experience.”
The apologies peaked in the 1990s, during which half of them were delivered, most likely for two reasons: Japan’s wartime generation had begun to pass from the scene, Hirohito having died in 1989. And Chinese and Korean leaders found that pointing fingers at the Japanese was a useful political diversion at home.
Thomas Berger, professor of international relations at Boston University and an authority on Japan, said in a recent interview with Time that Japan had apologized, “but those apologies have been fumbling and awkward and often undercut by revisionist statements from senior politicians.”
However, he added: “The Koreans and the Chinese bear a large share of the blame” for the continuing controversy because they have shown “very little readiness to accept Japan’s efforts to promote reconciliation and, as a result, those efforts have tended to founder.”
Just what Japan’s critics want in apologies is not clear, raising the suspicion that they would rather have the dispute than a resolution, for their own reasons. Here then is a suggestion, in three parts, for Japan to try to clear things up on its own:
‧ Comfort women: That prostitutes plied their trade with invading Japanese soldiers is not in question. What is disputed is whether innocent women were recruited or were coerced by military authorities into sexual service or were even sold into brothels by impoverished parents. A thorough international investigation would be in order.
‧ Apologies: The Japanese government would compile a record of all the apologies since 1945, with dates, places, who delivered and appropriate quotes, then translate them into Chinese, Korean and English, and publish and distribute those volumes to be retained as references.
‧ Emperor: Ask Japanese Emperor Akihito to go to the Budokan, the Hall of Martial Arts, on Aug. 15, the anniversary of the end of World War II, to deliver a dignified, but unstinting apology for all of Japan’s transgressions during the time in question.
The chances of this US-style settlement once and for all being undertaken by the Japanese and accepted by the Chinese, Koreans and Europeans are, realistically, somewhere between zero and minus-1,000.
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
RSS