On Feb. 14, Valentine’s Day, countless couples will celebrate romance by candlelight. On the same day, 1 billion women and men worldwide will stand up to shine a light on the darker side of gender relations.
According to the UN, one in three women worldwide will be raped or beaten in her lifetime. In some countries, up to seven in 10 women will be beaten, raped, abused, or mutilated. Often, the victims of such abuses are treated as criminals — dishonored, brutalized, ostracized, imprisoned and even executed — while perpetrators remain free. Millions of women suffer in this way, but their stories remain untold.
Last December, the brutal gang rape and murder of a 23-year-old woman in India — two months after Pakistan’s Taliban shot 14-year-old Malala Yousafzai for advocating education — triggered large-scale public protests. This outcry should mark the start of a global movement to lift the veil of silence that shrouds violence against women — which often begins at home — and protects the perpetrators.
From “honor killings” to child marriages, from date rape to sex slavery, crimes against women are prevalent in every society. However, when women are courageous enough to report abuse, doctors are often unhelpful, police are hostile and the justice system fails them. For example, one in three women in the US military is sexually assaulted, usually by a colleague, yet very few attackers are convicted. Likewise, in the UK, 473,000 sexual offenses are reported annually, 60,000 to 95,000 of which are classified as rape. However, in each of the last three years, only slightly more than 1,000 offenders were convicted of rape.
In the 1970s, feminists identified the connection between rape, male privilege and female sexual vilification. Today, readily accessible Internet pornography is teaching boys and men that sexual acts involving degradation and even violent abuse of women are acceptable.
Meanwhile, many privileged women, instilled with a strong sense of entitlement, dismiss feminism as passe. However, gender discrimination continues to pervade all aspects of society, with most social and political institutions continuing to foster “glass ceilings,” if not outright female subordination. Women receive equal pay and equal opportunities in very few countries.
Feminism thus has a crucial role to play in the 21st century. After all, as Michelle Bachelet, executive director of UN Women, has put it: “Violence against women is … a threat to democracy, a barrier to lasting peace, a burden on national economies, and an appalling human-rights violation.”
Governments must continue to advance women’s rights through legislation, while civil society must promote a cultural shift that rejects women’s marginalization or mistreatment. Only by enabling women to realize their potential can countries ensure economic and social progress.
This potential was evident during the Arab Spring uprisings, when women, empowered by recent advances in literacy and education, organized and led demonstrations that toppled decades-old regimes. In Egypt, even as female political activists and reporters were being sexually harassed in Tahrir Square, they continued to contribute to the revolution.
However, gender equality remains a distant goal in the region, with women being left out of the political process, exerting little influence in governing bodies or in drafting new constitutions. In fact, on the Egyptian revolution’s two-year anniversary last week, when thousands of demonstrators took to the streets to protest Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, at least nine female protesters were sexually assaulted in Tahrir Square.
Next month, government and civil-society leaders will gather in New York for a meeting of the UN Commission on the Status of Women to agree on a plan to eliminate violence against women. Global leaders should take this opportunity to pledge to adopt the policies and devote the resources needed to end pervasive violations of women’s human rights.
However, without the political will to enact legislation and enforce it effectively, promises are meaningless. Although 187 countries have signed the 1979 UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Violence Against Women, statistics show little progress.
Consider Afghanistan, which ratified the convention in 2009. An Action Aid survey last year found that violence against women has never been more prevalent, with 87 percent of women suffering domestic abuse. In the same year, Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s government upheld a husband’s legal right to beat his wife. If an Afghan man murders his wife, he can expect to pay a fine.
Change is possible, but it requires collective action by the international community to challenge the attitudes that lead to violence, oppression, and inequality. Five steps are particularly important:
■ Ratify and enforce all relevant regional and international treaties, and implement laws that prohibit violence against women and ensure effective punishment of offenses.
■ Enhance women’s economic and political empowerment, including by directing international aid toward their health, education and welfare.
■ Increase public awareness of the problem through traditional media, as well as through social media and other electronic channels.
■ Mobilize men and boys against violence through educational programs.
■ Improve support for survivors of violence and their families, including legal assistance, psychological counseling and health care.
Many international movements and organizations — such as Women Under Siege, V-Day and Stop Violence Against Women — are already working to deliver justice and security to women. Governments and political parties should support such initiatives.
All people deserve justice, equality and freedom from violence. On Feb. 14, women and men worldwide should support One Billion Rising, a global call for people to show their support for the 1 billion women who have survived violence and abuse. Whether you choose to strike, dance, speak out, or simply stand up, your involvement will bring the world closer to ending this deadly war against women.
George Papandreou is president of the Socialist International. Ouafa Hajji is president of Socialist International Women.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing