The reports this week from the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg about concerted attacks by Chinese hackers on their computer systems in the wake of unflattering coverage of Chinese leaders and other stories from China should be a cause for concern to everyone, but especially for people, businesses and the government in Taiwan.
A single click on a Web page link or an e-mail can often have unwanted results, as many computer users know, leading to the downloading of a virus, triggering spam or leading to identity theft. Concerted efforts by hackers, such as denial of service attacks, can temporarily cripple a company.
However, the apparent effort to monitor US media outlets, their journalists and possible contacts should serve as a reminder of the insidiousness and aggressiveness of Beijing’s efforts to control information, manipulate its image and fight every effort to make its actions more transparent.
The attack on Bloomberg came after it published a story in June last year about the wealth of relatives of Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平). The four-month-long attack on the Times followed a story by its Shanghai bureau chief, David Barboza, about the business activities and wealth of Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s (溫家寶) relatives.
According to the Times, Mandiant, a US computer security company, said in December that it had found evidence that Chinese hackers had stolen e-mails, contacts and files from more than 30 journalists and executives at Western news organizations, and some journalists were the subject of repeat attacks. Investigating the attacks on the Times, the company’s experts said the attacks started from the same university computers used by the Chinese military to attack US military contractors in the past.
This is not the first time Western journalists have been targets. In January 2010, several reporters in Beijing said their Gmail accounts had been hacked and their e-mails had been forwarded to other accounts. In March 2010, reporters and human rights activists in China and Taiwan reported their Yahoo e-mail accounts had been tampered with.
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of National Defense rebuffed the allegations of Chinese involvement in the attacks on the Times or other companies. Foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei (洪磊) said “Chinese laws clearly forbid hacking attacks, and we hope relevant parties take a responsible attitude on this issue.”
It is hard not to take such protestations cynically, given that Hong and other official spokespeople frequently deny that there is any press censorship in China or that human rights abuses take place. Such denials carry no weight.
China has long sought to gag critics within the country, through arrests, torture, imprisonment and “labor reform,” and to restrict its people’s access to the outside world. It has not had complete success, thanks to the bravery of so many Chinese who have been willing to risk everything to speak their minds, and to technological advances such as personal computers, the Internet and cellphones.
The growing attacks from China on the world’s free press should not be tolerated, nor should Beijing’s insulting denials of accountability.
China, of course, is not the only country from which cyberattacks are launched, but it is one of the worst offenders. US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton says a global effort is needed to establish “rules of the road” for cyberactivity. Taiwan should be in the forefront of such an effort.
Taiwanese have fought long and hard for political and media freedoms at home. The fight now needs to be carried out on a broader battleground, notwithstanding the government’s drive for closer ties with China. Beijing should be sent a very clear message that such snooping will not be tolerated and will have a price.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath