Not long ago, US President Barack Obama and the Republican Party reached an agreement to avoid the country’s so-called “fiscal cliff” by increasing taxes on high-income earners.
Inspired by the developments in the US, domestic public opinion has made repeated calls for Taiwan’s government to avoid our own “fiscal cliff.”
The difference between Taiwan and the US is that while the US managed to reach a last-minute agreement to prevent the crisis at least temporarily, Taiwan could well fall off the cliff with eyes wide open.
Taiwan’s fiscal cliff is a result of the government’s unrestricted expenditures, which have resulted in massive government debt.
Everyone is now aware of that the largest single expense is the huge pensions given to military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers.
The dispute over their year-end bonus was finally resolved, but anyone with a clear understanding of the situation knows that the fiscal cliff will be unavoidable unless the NT$240 billion (US$8.19 billion) pension budget item — which will increase further in the future — is cut.
This is not a case of alarmist talk, and Examination Yuan President John Kuan’s (關中) recent remarks clearly show the seriousness of the matter.
Until about a month ago, Kuan often gave arrogant answers when people criticized the pension system, saying that such criticism was an insult to government employees, who are different from ordinary people.
However, he has changed his attitude and is now saying that widespread early retirement for government employees would put too much budget pressure on the government, and he has even apologized for this state of affairs. It took him four years as Examination Yuan president and more than NT$1 trillion in pension expenditure before he got to that point.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration are surely aware of the urgency of the matter, but to judge from the Examination Yuan’s reform plan, it seems the authorities are procrastinating. They are mainly focusing on current government employees, including delaying their retirement age and reducing the income replacement ratio. Such measures are certainly necessary.
As for retired government employees, the group that is adding to the government’s debt burden, it seems as if the government is merely planning to lower their preferential interest rate from 18 to 12 percent.
In terms of the most difficult part, the income replacement ratio that allows retirees to enjoy a high pension, the government is still hesitant to take action. On the surface, the issue seems to involve whether the reduction of pensions should be retroactive, but reform is not about forcing people to return money they have received in the past, it is about restricting future payments.
This issue is beyond legal dispute. The real problem is political, because politicians are unwilling to abandon their die-hard supporters and risk losing their votes without good reason. Nevertheless, if reform is incomplete, a financial crisis will be unavoidable and current government employees will not receive reasonable retirement pensions in the future.
The Ma administration can of course continue to procrastinate in the hope that matters will change.
However, we must not forget the monstrosities that are the international credit rating organizations. Such organizations claim to be neutral, and they regularly evaluate the credibility of large enterprises, financial instruments and countries. Although they were partially responsible for the 2008 financial crisis, they remain as influential as ever.
These institutions also deserve credit for the fluctuation of the euro in recent years. Whenever they lower the ratings of Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece or Spain — the PIIGS countries — the stock and exchange markets in other countries suffer, while hedge funds and other such vultures see this as an opportunity to speculate in these markets, worsening the crisis further.
Taiwan is also a prey to these credit rating institutions.
Take Fitch Ratings, for example. It started to warn Taiwan that its national debt was too high in 2006 and its 2011 financial report clearly stated that Taiwan’s credit rating could be affected if the nation’s financial situation continues to deteriorate.
If and when that day comes, Taiwan’s international isolation would mean that we would have to rely on Chinese assistance.
Recently, the British weekly magazine The Economist advised Obama as he entered his second term that if he wants to leave a positive legacy, he should drastically reduce the US’ national debt. Ma would do well to heed the same advice.
Huang Juei-min is a law professor at Providence University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and