The reform of the pension program is Taiwan’s most significant systemic reform in 30 years. There are two special characteristics to the reform: On the one hand it is a comprehensive issue involving more than 10 million salaried workers, military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers. It covers almost all sectors and it spans across party lines, professions and social groups.
On the other hand it is a very specialized issue. The scope of reform, the income replacement ratio, premiums, payment standards and insurance fund performance require delicate financial calculations. In other words, it is a very complex undertaking involving both political issues and expertise.
Having learned lessons from the fuel and electricity price hikes and the capital gains tax on securities transactions, the government has adopted a more sophisticated approach to handling pension reform, emphasizing bottom-up policy formation. It has already held 122 seminars on the issue, with more than 10,000 participants.
The government also invited representatives from political parties, civil servants’ and veterans’ associations, teachers’ unions, and industry and commerce associations to discuss the reforms. Seeing such a combination of grassroots democracy and deliberative democracy has been refreshing.
Deliberative democracy has been adopted in Western democracies for many years and its purpose is to enhance representative politics. The practice stresses the importance of diversified participation, dialogue and communication through public hearings and community forums to encourage the public to think collectively about solutions to major issues through rational consideration and public decisionmaking.
It is an attempt to create a situation in which all parties acknowledge each other’s values, viewpoints and interests and then to find a solution that considers public interest and is acceptable to all those affected, thus implementing democracy in the problem-solving process.
The pension issue involves government agencies, social classes, intergenerational justice, financial sustainability and the public’s economic security, which is a core public interest.
Pension system reform requires a comprehensive overall approach, meaning that proposals from bureaucrats are not the only valid ones. The conflicts of interest involved require political negotiation, meaning a closed-door approach is doomed to fail.
By communicating, the government and public can consider the issue together, helping to discourage obstruction from individual professions or groups. If a conclusion can be reached together, social groups will gain a deeper sense of participation and self-centered approaches can be defused. This will assist the formation of a collective identity and consolidate shared values.
The government could expand transparency and participation during the reform process. First, it could employ publicly trusted actuaries to conduct a thorough review of the pension program’s financial situation. It should publish this information along with actuary formulas. Second, it could broadcast seminars and public hearings on the issue and publish relevant information.
Only by expanding public participation and continuing policy dialogue can Taiwanese implement the core values of constitutional democracy: fairness, justice, representativeness and participation.
The pension program is an issue that Taiwanese have to deal with together. The government and the oppostion should put aside their disagreements and work together to find a solution.
Jack Lee is a professor of public administration at National Open University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath