The Chinese Communist Party’s 18th National Congress last month elected Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) as the party’s new general secretary. Several things have happened since then that indicate Xi will take a hawkish line in foreign relations. These include China expressing its intention to strictly enforce its law in the South China Sea, its controversial inclusion of its territorial claims in the design of its new passports and repeated encroachments by Chinese vessels into waters surrounding the disputed Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — known as the Senkakus in Japan.
Just days before Japan’s general election on Dec. 16, China sent a reconnaissance plane to patrol the Diaoyutais, angering Japanese voters and helping Liberal Democratic Party leader Shinzo Abe, whom China regards as a rightist, become prime minister again. The incident won support for Abe’s advocacy of tougher policies on China. Japanese media said China’s actions seemed designed to win votes for Abe’s party. One might think that China’s leaders actually supported Abe’s call for Japan to alter its Constitution to make its Self-Defense Forces into a national military. Did Beijing not know what would come of such hawkish tactics?
Abe talked tough before the election, but on Dec. 22, he said his government would delay its plan to station coast guard officials on the Diaoyutai Islands. Abe said that Japan’s relationship with China was among its most important bilateral relations and that his government would make efforts to relaunch a mutually beneficial relationship with China.
However, on the very same day, China sent a surveillance plane into airspace about 100km north of the Diaoyutai Islands. The Chinese plane flew away after the Japanese Air Self-Defense Force dispatched fighter planes to intercept it. However, China’s move was a kick in the teeth for Abe, just as he spoke in such friendly terms.
Maybe China’s leaders think such actions strengthen their efforts to extend China’s sovereignty over the Diaoyutai Islands, but actually they are ineffective and will cause significant long-term damage to China’s image and national interests. The alliance between the US and Japan will get even closer, and the aim of amending Japan’s “Peace Constitution” will become easier to achieve. China’s actions will provide a rationale for Japan and its allies to exercise their right to collective self-defense.
The threat to Taiwan’s security comes from China. The nation’s security depends on getting help from its strategic allies, the US-Japan security alliance. However, since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) assumed office, his government has leaned excessively toward China and this policy has eroded confidence among Taiwan’s strategic allies. One sign of this is the US government’s refusal to sell more advanced weapons to Taiwan.
Although Ma insists that he has no intention of allying with China to resist Japan, he has permitted government vessels from Taiwan to escort fishing boats flying China’s national flag to land on the Diaoyutai Islands. Ma has never said a word about encroachments by Chinese government vessels and reconnaissance planes in the sea and airspace around the Diaoyutai Islands, which are Taiwan’s territory. This gives the international community the impression that Taiwan is acquiescing to Chinese sovereignty over the Diaoyutais.
Taiwan must strongly denounce the incursions by Chinese government vessels and surveillance planes around the Diaoyutais. Only by doing so can Taiwanese reverse the impression Taiwan is allying with China to resist Japan and mend the trust between Taiwan and its allies.
Chen Kuo-hsiung is a researcher with the Taiwan National Security Institute.
Translated by Julian Clegg
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030