In September, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) asked his Cabinet to improve the economy within three months. That period expires tomorrow. This promise has been as well kept as his other promises, like the one about selling the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) ill-gotten assets and the infamous “6-3-3” campaign pledge to deliver GDP growth of 6 percent, an unemployment rate of less than 3 percent and achieve a per capita income of more than US$30,000.
A Taiwan Thinktank survey showed that 95.7 percent of respondents believe this policy is just another bounced check, 84.7 percent think the economic situation this year was bad and 68.1 percent are finding it difficult to get a job. As many as 89.1 percent of those polled consider the poverty gap to be big, 84.9 percent are dissatisfied with their salaries, 72.8 percent think the tax system is unfair and 63.9 percent are pessimistic about the future.
The majority of the population is finding it a struggle to get by and are resentful at the government’s lack of solutions. Many now regret voting to give Ma his second term when he had performed so poorly in his first. Those who voted for Ma might regret it now, but they will have put up with their choice for another three years.
The government is refusing to accept defeat. The Cabinet is looking for good news and asking individual departments to collect statistics that will give the public reasons to be cheerful. This shows how clueless officials in this government are: Facts and figures are not going to improve people’s lives. If the government wants to brag about a promising stock market and export sales figures, it had better hope these are not just the effect of the Christmas shopping season.
The government’s GDP growth forecast for next year is 3.8 percent, but it predicted a growth of 3 percent for this year, a figure that had to be adjusted downward each month until there were no guarantees it would reach even 1 percent. The evening edition of the United Daily News has an opinion poll asking if people feel their lives are improving. The number who said “yes” suddenly rose to 20 percent. Even the newspaper suspects someone is fiddling the figures. We wonder who that might be.
This comes as a surprise to nobody. The Cabinet’s economic stimulus plan is not stimulating anything. The government has not adjusted the interest rate, increased the money supply or changed the exchange rate, so there has been no improvement in the competitiveness of Taiwanese exports or an increase in import/export traffic. The government has not increased its budget and so has failed to stimulate domestic investment or consumption. No attempt has been made to reduce government debt or get the state accounts back to black, nor has anything been done to significantly improve the investment environment or relax financial regulations. All the government has done is pin its hopes on attracting Taiwanese businesses back home from China. Conservative measures such as these are never going to have much of an impact in such an ambitiously short period of time.
The government’s only hope lies in a sudden upturn in the global economy. Unfortunately, the EU sovereign debt crisis is still in full swing and the US is currently teetering on the edge of a “fiscal cliff.” Even China is experiencing slackening growth figures. Taiwan relies on overseas trade, but the global markets are not in the best of health, so the government has nowhere left to turn.
Faced with the “Fury” (火大) protests organized by the Democratic Progressive Party, Ma should come clean and apologize to the public for his failures, instead of trying to evade the issue by saying that the government is trying its best. A prompt reshuffle of his Cabinet, to see if another set of heads can come up with better ideas, could be the only thing that stops him from being engulfed by the public’s fury.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS