Tue, Nov 27, 2012 - Page 9 News List

The whistleblower’s dilemma

Some are rewarded under US laws, while others get nothing and are vilified for speaking out

By Simon Neville  /  The Guardian

Illustration: Yusha

Whistleblowing is not for the faint-hearted. Careers can be ruined, marriages strained and pariah status is almost guaranteed. Nevertheless, a whistleblower from software company Autonomy decided to step forward and tell their new bosses at Hewlett Packard (HP) about alleged financial irregularities in the business.

HP has since written off US$8.8 billion from the value of Autonomy, which it bought for US$10 billion less than a year earlier, and informed the FBI and US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

As for the whistleblower, rather than facing the sack, he or she could be entitled to a multimillion-dollar payout thanks to new US laws.

Rules introduced by the Wall Street regulator mean a whistleblower can get up to a 30 percent cut of any fine handed out for wrongdoing.

Launched a year ago, the scheme made its first award in August, paying nearly US$50,000 to a whistleblower who alerted the SEC to a multimillion-dollar investment fraud.

However, former whistleblowers are less convinced such incentives are necessary and say they acted on their conscience rather than the thought of any financial reward.

Paul Moore, the former head of group risk for HBOS, who was sacked after warning the board it was taking excessive risks, turned whistleblower in 2009 having taken a payoff and signing a confidentiality agreement.

“Money was never a consideration and I don’t think it would have been. I was earning hundreds of thousands a year as one of the biggest compliance officers in the country. By comparison, last year I earned £15,000 [US$24,000]. I took the decision to speak out on the night Lehman Brothers went down. I was breaching a confidentiality agreement, but I thought the greatest good for the greatest number of people was to speak up because it would feed into the policy debate,” he said.

However, the fallout left him unable to work in banking again, turning to drink and putting a strain on his family life.

“Even though society wants people to speak up, they can’t get another job and get treated like a leper in your profession,” he said.

The US tax authorities have similar reward schemes. Earlier this year a former UBS banker, Bradley Birkenfeld, was given US$104 million for assisting the US tax authorities with its investigation into Swiss bank accounts. He was paid the money out of a US$780 million fine for the bank.

However, former Olympus chief executive officer Michael Woodford, who exposed a £1 billion fraud at the company before he was sacked, warned against such large payouts.

“I agree with the principles of having some financial protection for people going forward, but there should be a limit of around US$2 million,” he said.

“Look at the UBS whistleblower who got US$100 million. That’s like winning the Euromillions and it’s not morally justified to pay such a huge amount. That money should have gone to the state imposing the fines,” he said.

There are no state-sanctioned financial incentives for whistleblowers in the UK and the City regulator is unlikely to follow the US’ lead.

Despite this, a survey by risk advisers Kroll found UK employees were responsible for nearly one in four tip-offs the SEC gets from foreign employees, suggesting financial incentives could increase the number of whistleblowers coming forward to the UK’s Financial Services Authority.

This story has been viewed 3094 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top