After a brief moment of joy over the nation’s exports finally increasing at an annual rate of 10.4 percent in September, ending six consecutive months of declines, last month’s foreign trade data, released last week, showed outbound shipments tumbled again, declining by 1.9 percent from the same period a year ago.
The latest data suggest that the light at the end of the economic tunnel seen a month ago might be just an illusion, as the September results were perhaps due to temporary factors — such as the launches of new consumer electronics products and downstream vendors’ inventory buildups to meet consumer demand ahead of China’s annual Golden Week holiday — and that they came from last year’s low comparison base.
However, the most obvious implication is that Taiwan’s economy is still suffering from sluggish global economic activity and the nation could be the worst performer among Asia’s major exporters this year. Therefore, both the government and the public should remain alert for signs of a worsening downturn.
On Thursday, the Ministry of Finance reported that exports unexpectedly fell 1.9 percent last month from a year earlier and were 2.4 percent down from the previous month, at US$26.53 billion. Imports also performed worse than expected last month, dropping 1.8 percent year-on-year and up 0.78 percent month-on-month at US$23.27 billion. Cumulative exports in the first 10 months of the year dropped 3.7 percent to US$250.13 billion, while cumulative imports fell 4.7 percent to US$227.26 billion, the ministry’s data showed.
According to the ministry, the reason that exports resumed their decline was because eight of the nation’s 10 major export sectors posted year-on-year contractions in shipments, which was led by a 36.1 percent fall in shipments of information and communication technology (ICT) products (including HTC Corp’s smartphones and Acer Inc’s personal computers). Moreover, with still-weak exports to the US and Europe, slowing growth in exports to Asian economies also took a toll on outbound shipments last month, raising concerns about the prospects for intra-regional trade.
Although a high comparison base could be blamed for the disappointing foreign trade figures, it is not sufficient to justify last month’s surprising decline. Instead, it allows further room to worry about the underlying health of Taiwan’s ICT sector, as the ministry’s data showed it continued to present the largest contraction among the 10 major export categories since May.
There is cause for concern over the declining global competitiveness of Taiwanese ICT products. During previous downturns this sector’s exports were hit harder than those of the nation’s major trading rivals and did not recover at a faster pace when the global economy started to rebound. This issue also highlights the challenge facing the nation in transforming its industrial structure and diversifying exports beyond ICT.
The latest data indicated that overall imports remained in low gear last month. However, a closer look at the data showed that imports of capital equipment increased 4.2 percent last month from a year earlier, following a 0.2 percent decline the previous month, and had improved for three consecutive months. This did offer positive signs for the economy as it might indicate stronger domestic investment in the months ahead.
However, an annual decline of 0.6 percent in consumer goods imports, after an 11.3 percent increase in September, is a strong reminder that private consumption could be a major drag factor on domestic demand.
Looking ahead, the ministry said exports for this month and next month could see modest growth because of seasonal demand and it did not rule out the contribution of a low-base effect. Late last month, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics forecast that full-year exports could fall 2.5 percent to show the first contraction since the global financial crisis began, and the latest foreign trade data suggested prospects for Taiwan’s exports remain cloudy, and that the possibility of further downward adjustments to exports, as well as to GDP growth, exist.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing