According to the results of a survey released by the Educational Testing Service recently, 95.9 percent of Taiwan’s top 1,000 companies say that their employees need to use English in their jobs. However, only 27.9 percent of the companies ask to see a score for the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) — a popular English proficiency test — when recruiting employees, while 83.4 percent of Japan’s companies and 100 percent of South Korea’s companies demand a TOEIC score.
Moreover, top companies in Taiwan merely require an average of 550 points on the TOEIC, which is much lower than the 700 points required by South Korea’s companies in the 990-point test. No wonder only 2.4 percent of Taiwanese companies are satisfied with employees’ English communication skills.
As a matter of fact, if we examine TOEIC scores, the average of 542 points in Taiwan is slightly higher than the average of 510 points in Japan, but much lower than South Korea’s average of 626 points. This gives South Korean companies a clear advantage in today’s increasingly globalized world.
To keep up with South Korea, perhaps we can start from several aspects. First, top Taiwanese companies should gradually lift their recruitment threshold to 600 or 650 points. An even higher standard should be adopted for managers or employees responsible for negotiations. By doing so, companies can show their determination to recruit talent with good English skills, while encouraging applicants to constantly improve these skills. Internal training sessions and an English-speaking environment are also helpful.
Some leading Japanese and South Korean companies hold internal meetings in English and require employees to write e-mails only in English. Taiwanese companies can learn from them to prepare employees for possible business situations.
Next, schools should take a more pragmatic approach to providing English courses. Currently, many universities only offer English courses to freshmen and sometimes sophomore students. Also, Taiwan’s private universities of science and technology tend not to pay attention to students’ English proficiency, so their average of 434 points is significantly lower than regular public university students’ average of 638 points and regular private university students’ average of 567 points. To improve this, it is necessary to increase class hours. More importantly, schools should improve curricula by adding useful business-related materials.
Students must be aware of the reality of the workplace and approach it in a serious and pro-active way. Have the Taiwanese youth complaining that their average salaries are inferior to those of their South Korean counterparts taken a good look at what they are doing and resolved to put more effort into their studies?
Last, the government should set an example by attaching great importance to English to promote Taiwan’s internationalization. It should encourage civil servants to take language courses and proficiency tests by providing incentives, and create a friendlier environment for foreigners. One problem that needs to be addressed promptly is the poor quality of the English Web sites of many government agencies.
Take the Ministry of Education for example: The “news” section on its English Web site was last updated more than three months ago. Some government agencies even spell their English names incorrectly or update their English Web sites only once or twice a year.
Only when these measures are put into place may we have a chance to improve employees’ English and prepare them for the global business world.
Chang Sheng-en is an assistant professor in the English Department at Shih Hsin University.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS