Taiwan’s newly appointed representative to the WTO, former Mainland Affairs Council chairperson Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛), has been part of the pan-blue camp for several years, having crossed over from the greens. According to Lai, she was instrumental in the original negotiations for Taiwan’s entrance into the WTO in 2001, so this appointment must be like returning to familiar territory.
There are many in the worlds of politics and academia, concerned about the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty, who have always had serious doubts about how Lai handled the WTO entry. Nothing she has said or done since has dispelled these doubts. If she fails to clarify certain points before she takes up her new appointment, it will be difficult for people to trust her entirely.
First, when she completed the final draft of the committee report that formed the basic condition for Taiwan’s WTO entry, she agreed to remove all words and phrases, in more than 30 places within the text, that alluded to sovereignty. She replaced words like “president,” “Executive Yuan,” “Legislative Yuan” and “Ministry of Justice,” with those that did not imply sovereignty, sowing the seeds for the uncertainty over the exact nature of Taiwan’s status within the organization. She has therefore been accused of “forfeiting the nation’s sovereignty under humiliating conditions.”
Second, the distortions introduced by Lai during the drafting process are readily accessible in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ (MOFA) archives. Given the importance of Taiwan’s WTO entry — something unrelated to differences between the blue and green camps — surely President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would have checked the MOFA archives?
Third, Lai once said during an interview that, at the time, she had been to more than 20 European countries in just 19 days, fighting for Taiwan’s interests. Think how much trouble this would have caused Taiwan’s representatives in these countries given the nature of making appointments with government officials and how much time it would have taken. It would be quite easy to check the archives on the MOFA Web site to see whether this trip actually happened and how she achieved this epic feat.
No wonder professor Hung Szu-chu (洪思竹) felt compelled to write a 14,000-word paper on these events, entitled A Lie Cannot Live (謊言不能久活).
Peng Ming-min is a former senior political adviser to the president.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath