Working holiday visas are a kind of reciprocal goodwill arrangement between countries. Programs like this allow young people to fund their holidays by working, and they promote mutual exchanges and understanding between the countries involved.
More than five years have passed since Taiwan and Australia established a bilateral working visa agreement. This kind of exchange is a developing trend in the global village. In addition to Australia, Taiwan has signed agreements that allow young people to go on working holidays in the UK, Germany, Canada, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea — seven partner countries altogether. The purpose is to enrich the world outlook and experience of young people from the various countries involved.
Australia is a big country with plentiful resources, and it offers a wealth of natural scenery and cultural attractions. It has an efficient infrastructure and is a relatively safe place to live. Its population density is just three people per square kilometer. Australia has long been a Mecca for travelers from around the world, and it is also the closest country to Taiwan that is English-speaking and has a Western culture.
The thousands of working holiday visas that Australia grants each year make the prospect of visiting Australia highly attractive to young people who are weary of Taiwan’s crowded lifestyle. Australia’s working holiday program opens a door that gives Taiwanese youth an opportunity to become more independent and learn about different cultures and ways of life.
Applicants for Australian working holiday visas must be between 18 and 30 years old. The visa allows them to stay in Australia for one year, during which time they can do short-term or temporary jobs, but the main point is that whatever kind of work they do, the purpose is to travel and have a holiday. For this reason, each participant may not work for a single employer for more than six months, and if they take part in language courses, the maximum time for study is four months. Applicants must also show that they have NT$150,000 or more saved up to cover the cost of the first part of their holidays.
Recently a Taiwanese magazine published a wantonly distorted report about a graduate from National Tsing Hua University who went to Australia and worked in a slaughterhouse, describing the graduate in miserable terms as a Taiwanese migrant laborer, and other media quickly took up the theme.
This incident provides an opportunity to consider what kind of mentality and motives would lead our media to publish such a warped report. It is an apt moment to take a look at the conditions faced by Taiwanese workers and by foreign migrant workers in Taiwan, and indeed to reflect on the kind of work ethics and educational philosophy that exists in Taiwanese culture.
Many young Taiwanese have gone on working holidays in Australia over the past few years, and magazines have often carried reports about it. Most of these have been pretty balanced in describing the joys and sorrows of the experience. Only in this most recent article have we seen such a distorted picture. People can always find ways of showing how superior they are. On this occasion, state-run universities were the selling point. Despite failing to show any cause-and-effect relationship, the magazine article had an immediate political and social impact. Still, the truth of the matter is gradually coming to light, and falsehoods will not last for long.
Working in an Australian slaughterhouse is not an easy job, but what about working in a Taiwanese slaughterhouse? It can definitely be said that Australia offers better pay, and you would be less likely to see serious animal abuse — even pumping the animals’ stomachs full of water to make them weigh more, such as happens here in Taiwan.
Experiencing the similarities and differences should be quite a revelation for an economics graduate like the one in the magazine report. It should also have given him a chance to experience the reality of what economics students learn about in their textbooks. After all, the international division of labor is nothing new, whatever permutations it may go through.
All economic spheres are made up of a number of interconnected regions that are at different levels of development. There is usually a narrow core that is connected with some quite developed secondary regions, and then further connected to a broad peripheral zone. The differences that exist between different economies in terms of salaries, quality of life, GNP and trade surpluses clearly illustrate this reality.
Evidently the Tsing Hua University student’s experience working in an Australian slaughterhouse was more unforgettable than that of working as a financial adviser in Taiwan. Let us hope that the next generation will not grow up to be “strawberries” who can’t stand any kind of hardship or “NEETs” (people not in education, employment or training) who remain dependent on their parents or state welfare.
Thousands of young Taiwanese are over in Australia right now proving their abilities, ambition and willingness to learn. Surely that is something to be encouraged. The shallow narrative about Taiwanese migrant labor is far divorced from the truth and far removed from the goodwill that the Australian authorities have shown by giving young people from Taiwan and other countries visas to go there on working holidays.
In response to the magazine report, some people have commented that Taiwan has too many university students while the technical and vocational education sector is breaking down. Others say that the minimum wage is too low, that government policies are biased in favor of employers, or they talk about the conditions faced by foreign migrant workers in Taiwan, or they point out that salaries in Taiwan have been stagnant for more than a decade and that manpower and capital are draining out of Taiwan into China.
All of these points are quite true and worthy of consideration. However, what we do not need is to get stuck in a gloomy and prejudiced mindset that sees some types of work as inferior to others.
Chiang Sheng is an attending physician in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Mackay Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath