Discrimination has reared its ugly face again, even if the people involved insist it is a matter of safety, not prejudice. However, it is prejudice plain, simple and ugly.
Residents of Rueilian Community (瑞聯社區) in Taoyuan County’s Bade City (八德) do not want foreign workers from Ablecome Technology living in the community because of safety concerns, and went so far as to hang up a banner saying so.
Taoyuan County Councilor Lu Lin Hsiao-feng (呂林小鳳) denied it is a case of racial discrimination.
“It has nothing to do with discrimination,” she was quoted as saying. “With 460 households and more than 1,000 residents, Rueilian is a peaceful community. They are merely worried that clashes could happen because of these foreign workers, with their different skin color and different culture, going in and out of the community.”
Different skin, different culture, different. That is the key word. Rueilian residents are not prejudiced. They just do not like anyone who is different, especially if they have darker skin. Resident Lin Feng-mei (林鳳美) said in a video clip aired by Public Television that families with children no longer felt safe playing in the community’s park because “those foreign workers also spend their leisure time in the park.” As if it were not bad enough to have to share an apartment building with foreigners, having to share an open, public space with them is even more unnerving.
Rather than being open to the idea that someone from a different country and culture living nearby offers an opportunity to learn something about another culture — or even learn that people are more alike than they are different — the people of Rueilian have chosen to close their doors and live in fear. And they are teaching their children to fear difference.
Fear was also palpable in the recent uproar about a Taiwanese university graduate who was open enough to admit that he was using his working holiday visa for Australia to do hard manual work (in a slaughterhouse) to save money for home rather than work and then spend his earnings traveling around Australia. This raised the fear among some that Taiwan could be turning into a “nation of migrant workers.”
There was much discussion of Taiwan’s stagnating economy and the government’s inability to revive the economy, but the undercurrent was that Taiwan was better than those other countries with large migrant worker populations such as the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia; that being Taiwanese was better than being one of “them”, and yet here was a Taiwanese working as migrant laborer, a university graduate no less. Which just shows how little people here understand the economics of migrant work and the fact that many of the Filipinos, Indonesians and others working in blue-collar or homecare positions here or in other nations may also be university graduates. It is easier to look down on someone if all you see are differences.
Taiwan has long been a nation of migrants — the migrants from Fujian Province who came here 300 and 400 years ago, the flood of Mainlanders after the Chinese Civil War, the tens of thousands who have immigrated to the US, Canada and other countries since World War II. Think of the thousands who now work in China (or doesn’t that count?).
Many of those early immigrants to other countries encountered difficulties and prejudice, as a visit to the “Immigrants Building America” exhibition at the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial will attest. So it is tragic that their descendants are so willing to dish out that same discrimination.
It is a shame and it is a loss for a nation that has begun to proclaim — at least in government publications and promotional campaigns — that it has benefited from a melding of people and cultures: Aboriginal, Chinese, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, to realize just how much prejudice remains. The residents of Rueilian should be ashamed — but so should many others.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath