Democratic dictatorship
Taiwan is becoming a paradoxical country under a democratic dictatorship — the president is elected by popular vote, but his administration seldom listens to or cares for the people. Democracy is merely camouflage.
If the National Communications Commission does not reject a media merger deal, media in Taiwan will be monopolized and Taiwanese will lose their freedom of the press again, like in the White Terror era. People have protested against media monopolies — but in vain. A few months ago, Cheng Hung-yi’s (鄭弘儀) TV talk show, a popular political mouthpiece for Taiwanese, was canceled, showing the first sign of deterioration in the freedom of speech.
In the presidential election in January, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) smear campaign and vast illegal partisan assets were weapons to suppress the opposition parties in an attempt to re-establish one-party dictatorship. Since the court has found that former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) did nothing wrong in the so-called Yu-chang case, is it not the case that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) re-election campaign is guilty of causing Tsai’s loss in the presidential election?
However, the court also found nothing wrong with Ma’s re-election campaign. Such “logic” does not make sense to normal people.
Now the Control Yuan is investigating Tsai again in connection with the Yu Chang case and impeaching Tsai’s running mate for building a farmhouse he donated during the campaigning.
The Control Yuan is more interested in investigating former government officials than current ones. Taiwanese are being brainwashed to think that pan-green officials are always wrong and pan-blue officials are always right.
President Ma is experienced in dictating domestic politics but inexperienced in handling international situations because of his policy of diplomatic ceasefire. For example, in a recent interview with Japanese broadcaster NHK, Ma indicated that Taiwanese fished near the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) 100 years ago. He has been engaged in the Diaoyutais protection movement since his Harvard years, but he forgot that Taiwan was ruled by Japan for 50 years. At that time, of course, Taiwanese could fish near the Diaoyutais. If Ma has any evidence to show that the Diaoyutais were part of Taiwan rather than Okinawa during the Japanese era, then Ma has a strong claim. Claiming sovereignty over the Diaoyutais on an island 140km away is like “scratching an itchy foot with the shoe on.”
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath