One of the mafia’s most notorious crimes has returned after 20 years to haunt Italy, dragging Italian President Giorgio Napolitano into a nasty constitutional dispute in the run-up to a watershed election next year.
The dispute, connected to the murder of anti-mafia magistrate Paolo Borsellino and his five-strong police escort in Palermo, Italy, in July 1992, has unleashed a messy clash involving state institutions, politicians, judges and the media.
The clash erupted when Napolitano demanded that prosecutors destroy a taped conversation between him and one of 12 people accused of negotiating with mob bosses. Critics say his action could undermine the power of judges to investigate politicians, open him to political attacks and spark a constitutional crisis.
The case has erupted at a time when the president must play a crucial role, deciding when to call elections — most likely next spring — and shepherding the debt-laden country toward a poll ending Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti’s technocrat government.
What will follow is deeply uncertain, adding to market jitters about Italy’s economy. Both sides accuse the other of trying to exploit the dispute for political ends and weaken the president at a sensitive moment.
Napolitano himself issued an unusually angry statement on Thursday last week referring to “dark and destabilizing moves,” while Monti said: “We are faced by an exploitative attack.”
RESPECTED FIGURE
The president is accorded unusual respect in a country where most politicians are viewed with skepticism or contempt, and Napolitano was hailed as a hero when he ended the scandal-plagued tenure of Silvio Berlusconi as prime minister in November last year and brought in Monti to save Italy from a Greek-style crisis.
However, a dispute over an investigation into alleged negotiations to stop mafia attacks on government and judicial officials before and after Borsellino’s murder has exposed him to unusually outspoken attacks.
Napolitano became vulnerable because the prosecutors taped calls made to him by former Italian interior minister Nicola Mancino, who is accused of perjury for denying he knew about the negotiations. Mancino was allegedly asking for help in dealing with the case during the calls starting in November.
Napolitano says it is illegal to tap the president, even indirectly, and when the prosecutors denied this and refused to destroy the recording, he appealed to the constitutional court. He says he has nothing to hide, but is protecting his office as an independent figure above the political fray.
The court has promised to expedite a verdict by the end of the year, only a few months before the expected election date, but Napolitano’s action has already created a political storm with unpredictable results.
Borsellino’s brother, Salvatore, has called on Napolitano to step down. He said the president’s action was “an obstacle on the road to truth and justice over the massacre and the negotiations, which led to the murder of my brother.”
He called on Napolitano to make the call public and put an end to “maneuvers possibly aimed at destabilizing the president and our country’s institutions.”
Most mainstream papers and major parties have defended Napolitano, but he has been attacked by rising populist leader Beppe Grillo, the Fatto Quotidiano daily and former magistrate Antonio di Pietro, who leads the small Italy of Values party.
Influential former senior judge and member of parliament Luciano Violante alleges they represent “judicial populism” aimed at damaging both Napolitano and the Monti government.
On Thursday last week, Panorama magazine, which is owned by Berlusconi’s family, caused new uproar when it alleged the phone taps included Napolitano rudely disparaging the former prime minister at the same time he was replacing him with Monti last year.
Berlusconi has for years denounced left-wing magistrates who have brought repeated cases against him, most frequently for fraud and corruption, but recently over a lurid sex scandal.
His People of Freedom (PDL) party seized on the affair to reinforce their demand for a law restricting taps — often used in the past against the media magnate.
Daniela Santanche, a fiery PDL MP close to Berlusconi, said on Friday last week that he should be reinstated if the taps showed Napolitano was not impartial.
MODERN HEROES
Borsellino’s murder in a giant car bomb outside his mother’s Palermo home came at a low point in the war against the mob.
He died only two months after his friend and top anti-mafia prosecutor Giovanni Falcone died in a half-tonne bomb explosion that also killed his wife and three police escorts.
The case has particular resonance because the two men are Italy’s biggest modern heroes with streets named after them everywhere.
A picture of them smiling together was ubiquitous on street corners during this year’s anniversary of the killings, when politicians of every stripe attended commemoration ceremonies, calling for the truth to be unearthed about the murders.
Palermo prosecutors last month requested trial for six mob-connected figures and six former state or police officials, including Mancino and an ex-secret service chief, on charges connected to alleged negotiations between 1992 and 1994.
The mafia is believed to have offered to end a string of attacks on officials, judges and politicians, including Falcone, in exchange for lighter sentences and softer jail conditions for convicted gangsters.
“Paolo’s murder was accelerated because he opposed the negotiations,” Salvatore Borsellino said. “He would have been killed in any case. It had already been decreed, but they would have preferred not to do it so soon after the death of Falcone because this inevitably caused a state reaction.”
The war against the mafia was indeed boosted and “boss of bosses” Toto “the beast” Riina was captured in 1993.
Borsellino said magistrates must clarify whether the secret service was involved directly in his brother’s murder. That has long been rumored because an unidentified non-mob figure was present when the car bomb was prepared and difficult-to-acquire Semtex explosive was used in the device, according to informers.
Hence, the stakes were high in the case even before Napolitano was dragged into the constitutional dispute.
“If all or even some of the accused are convicted it will be a bombshell for Italian institutions,” said James Walston, politics professor at the American University in Rome.
“Even without convictions, and with what we already know, the effects on public institutions are devastating,” he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing