The widening gap between technical and vocational education and the real world has recently raised concern in the business sector about the quality of education and job prospects for graduates. Companies have found that job applicants lack the exact skills needed for the available positions and, in their view, the school curriculum is out of step with their needs.
At a meeting on Tuesday in Taichung between representatives of the local machine tool industry and a number of principals of technical colleges and vocational schools, companies expressed concern that schools nowadays have not worked hard enough to link their classrooms to the reality of the working world.
Based on local media reports, business representatives said at the meeting that current textbooks and school equipment, as well as the technology certifications and training programs these schools have on offer, are outdated and not suitable to the industry’s needs.
Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧), who also attended the meeting, reportedly said he was “shocked” at this discrepancy between school training and the industry’s requirements, and that a gap so huge was “beyond his imagination.”
However, Chiang should not be surprised at all. Before assuming his ministerial post in February, the 54-year-old Stanford University PhD graduate was president of the National Central University.
He has a long track record of contributing to that university and to this country’s elite education systems. He should have known better about the privileges elite universities enjoy and the disadvantages that other sectors of the education system must suffer.
In 2007, in his capacity as presidential candidate, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that, if elected, he would budget NT$10 billion (US$333.3 million) a year to improve the nation’s technical and vocational education. And in 2009, the Ministry of Education proposed a NT$20 billion three-year reform program, aiming to upgrade the technical and vocational education system with the hope that it can meet the demands of both industry and the market.
However, in the end, citing a shortage of funds, the government only managed to provide NT$300 million a year to advance technical and vocational education. This money is shared by all technical colleges and vocational schools in Taiwan to offer professional training for teachers, sponsor student internship programs and recruit industry instructors for course design. This contrasts sharply with the yearly budget of NT$3 billion for the National Taiwan University, which itself is part of a NT$50 billion five-year program to create Taiwan’s top universities.
Unfortunately, the just-approved central government budget for next year, which has a total spending capacity of NT$1.94 trillion, shows no sign of increased funding for vocational education. While the ministry has vowed to re-propose the NT$20 billion three-year vocational education program next year and is seeking collaboration with local industries to improve school equipment, curricula and faculty, so far the government’s education policy has only shown favoritism to a few top schools.
Considering that an increasing number of people are clamoring for education reform and more students are willing to spend money on courses which will secure them jobs upon graduation, the government’s unbalanced resource allocation is a real disappointment.
Without providing the required funds, the government is merely paying lip service. In the absence of real reform in technical and vocational education, the idea of having a reliable and quality workforce is simply far-fetched.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath