Games are about winning
The Olympic Games are a contest to win medals — at all costs — within the legal framework of each respective sport.
The actions of the South Korean, Chinese and Indonesian women badminton teams — where they deliberately threw their matches — at the London Olympics were shameful and regrettable. However, they were done in order to win.
I feel sorry for the people who paid good money to watch these matches, but that is where my sympathy ends.
These women, like all other Olympians, have trained for most their lives to reach this level. They knew the way the tournament was seeded and how things would end up, and they did everything within their legal rights in order to win their medals.
Even the No. 1 badminton player, Lin Dan (林丹) from China, spoke about the flawed seeding system employed.
Obviously, Torch Pratt is not much of a sports fan but rather a foreigner who invests heavily in Taiwan’s commitment to true independence. Hence his meandering rant which attempted to correlate China’s international geopolitical stance with the actions of these Chinese badminton players (Letter, Aug. 9, page 8).
If he was well-versed in sports he would know that athletes and teams from all levels have always conspired to match up or avoid a certain team or player.
The most ridiculous of all his arguments is his support for the Williams sisters. They have openly admitted that they have thrown matches multiple times in order to avoid controversy or rivalry.
Frank Aquino
Tamsui
The trends of religion
I recently used numbers from the Ministry of Interior’s Department of Statistics to calculate some trends in the government’s statistics for religion in Taiwan.
There has been a significant decrease in the number of registered practitioners of both Buddhism and Daoism since 2001.
However, the decline in registered Buddhists has been especially dramatic.
The documented numbers show a steep fall from 212, 671 registered Buddhists in 2001 to just 167,088 last year.
If we adjust these numbers to reflect the overall growth in population, the decline is even more dramatic.
Although I have read many publications on Buddhism in Taiwan, I have not yet seen any academic evaluation of this decline in numbers.
I would be interested to know to what extent the decline in the number of religious followers reflects real social change in Taiwan, and to what extent this may reflect changing institutional practices.
It would be interesting to examine if there really are fewer Buddhists, or if institutions are just doing a bad job of documenting them, or both.
The concurrent decline in the number of Taoists suggests that the trend is substantive and not merely an accounting error.
Eisel Mazard
Saskatchewan, Canada
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath